Name:
Nossal_et_al-2019-Journal_of_G ...
Size:
2.380Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary LabIssue Date
2019-12-27
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Nossal, S. M., Mierkiewicz, E. J., Roesler, F. L., Woodward, R. C., Gardner, D. D., & Haffner, L. M. (2019). Geocoronal hydrogen emission variation over two solar cycles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 124, 10,674-10,689. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026903Rights
Copyright © 2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Ground‐based hydrogen Balmer‐α observations from Northern midlatitudes span multiple solar cycles, facilitating investigation of decadal scale variations, including natural variability in the hydrogen response to solar geophysical changes. Here we present a reanalysis of ground‐based hydrogen emission observations from the early 1990s and their comparison with observations obtained in 2000–2001 in the context of the extended Northern Hemisphere midlatitude geocoronal hydrogen emission data set. This work suggests an increase in hydrogen emission intensity between the solar‐maximum period of 1990–1991 (Solar Cycle 22) and the near‐solar‐maximum period of 2000–2001 (Solar Cycle 23), with the caveat that this is a limited data set and that there are calibration uncertainties discussed in this paper. Solar activity was higher during the earlier solar maximum period. Thus, the apparent increase in intensity is counter to previous observations from midlatitudes in which the observed intensity increases with higher solar activity. This increase was also not seen in comparison of intensities from three solar minima periods. Further, the apparent increase in intensity is also likely of larger magnitude than model simulations would predict due to increases in methane and carbon dioxide. We will discuss the reanalysis and recalibration of the 1990–1991 observations using current analysis approaches and the interpretation of these observations in the context of observations and modeling of hydrogen variation over different time scales. The detailed review of the calibration procedures has also provided insights to guide design of future observations.Note
6 month embargo; published online: 27 December 2019ISSN
2169-9380Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Science Foundation (NSF) [AGS-1343048, AGS-1352311, AST-1108911, AST-1714472/1715623]; University of Wisconsin-Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education; Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2019ja026903