• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A guideline for appropriate application of vertically-integrated modeling approaches for geologic carbon storage modeling

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Accepted version - Bandilla KW ...
    Size:
    1.046Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Author
    Bandilla, Karl W.
    Guo, Bo
    Celia, Michael A.
    Affiliation
    Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci
    Issue Date
    2019-09-12
    Keywords
    Geologic carbon storage modeling
    Model complexity
    Decision criteria
    Model choice
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    ELSEVIER SCI LTD
    Citation
    Bandilla, K. W., Guo, B., & Celia, M. A. (2019). A guideline for appropriate application of vertically-integrated modeling approaches for geologic carbon storage modeling. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 91, 102808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102808 ‌
    Journal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
    Rights
    Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Collection Information
    This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
    Abstract
    Mathematical modeling is an essential tool for answering questions related to geologic carbon storage (GCS). The choice of modeling approach depends on the type of questions being asked. In this paper we discuss a series of approaches with a hierarchical complexity including vertically-integrated single-phase flow approaches, vertically-integrated multi-phase flow approaches (with and without vertical equilibrium assumption), three-dimensional multi-phase flow approaches, and fully-coupled multi-phase flow approaches that couple flow with geochemistry and/or geomechanics. Three spatial scales are used to categorize the questions to be addressed by modeling: regional scale (encompasses CO2 plume extent and majority of area of pressure impact of one or more injection operations), site scale (includes the CO2 plume extent and some of the area impacted by the pressure increase of a single injection site), and well scale (the immediate vicinity of an injection well). A set of guidelines is developed to help modelers choose the most appropriate modeling approach, and show when simpler modeling approaches may be the better choice. Vertically-integrated single-phase flow models are the most appropriate choice at both the site and regional scales, if the pressure impact outside of the CO2 plume is of interest. Vertically-integrated multi-phase flow models should be chosen at the regional scale, if the locations of CO2 plumes are of interest, and at the site scale if vertical segregation of CO2 and brine is fast or vertical heterogeneity in properties can be presented by distinct, continuous layers. Three-dimensional multi-phase flow models are the appropriate choice at the well and site scales for cases with significant vertical flow components of CO2 and brine. Fully-coupled multi-phase flow models should only be chosen if pore-space alteration through geochemistry or geomechanics feeds back to fluid flow.
    Note
    24 month embargo; published online: 12 September 2019
    ISSN
    1750-5836
    DOI
    10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102808
    Version
    Final accepted manuscript
    Sponsors
    Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton University; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) United States Department of Energy (DOE) [FE009563]; DOE/NETL United States Department of Energy (DOE)
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102808
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.