The Meta Salud Diabetes Implementation Study: Qualitative Methods to Assess Integration of a Health Promotion Intervention Into Primary Care to Reduce CVD Risk Among an Underserved Population With Diabetes in Sonora, Mexico
Denman, Catalina A
Castro-Vasquez, Maria Del Carmen
Ocejo, Abraham Garcia
de Zapien, Jill Guernsey
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Hlth Promot Sci, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth
Univ Arizona, Dept Epidemiol, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth
Univ Arizona, Div Publ Hlth Practice & Translat Res, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
CitationIngram M, Denman CA, Cornejo-Vucovich E, Castro-Vasquez MdC, Aceves B, Ocejo AG, Zapien J and Rosales C (2019) The Meta Salud Diabetes Implementation Study: Qualitative Methods to Assess Integration of a Health Promotion Intervention Into Primary Care to Reduce CVD Risk Among an Underserved Population With Diabetes in Sonora, Mexico. Front. Public Health 7:347. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00347
JournalFRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
RightsCopyright © 2019 Ingram, Denman, Cornejo-Vucovich, Castro-Vasquez, Aceves, Ocejo, Zapien and Rosales. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractBackground: Within health promotion research, there is a need to assess strategies for integration and scale up in primary care settings. Hybrid interventions that combine clinical effectiveness trials with implementation studies can elicit important contextual information on facilitators and barriers to integration within a health care system. This article describes lessons learned in developing and implementing a qualitative study of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) among people with diabetes in Sonora, Mexico, 2015-2019. Methods:The research team worked cooperatively with health center personnel from 12 Centers that implemented the intervention. The study used observations, stakeholder meetings, case studies, staff interviews and decision maker interviews to explore issues such as staff capacity, authority, workflow, space, and conflicting priorities, as well as patients' response to the program within the clinical context and their immediate social environments. Applying a multi-layered contextual framework, two members of the research team coded an initial sample of the data to establish inclusion criteria for each contextual factor. The full team finalized definitions and identified sub nodes for the final codebook. Results: Characteristics of management, staffing, and the local environment were identified as essential to integration and eventual adoption and scale up across the health system. Issues included absence of standardized training and capacity building in chronic disease and health promotion, inadequate medical supplies, a need for program monitoring and feedback, and lack of interdisciplinary support for center staff. Lack of institutional support stemming from a curative vs. preventive approach to care was a barrier for health promotion efforts. Evolving analysis, interpretation, and discussion resulted in modifications of flexible aspects of the intervention to realities of the health center environment. Conclusion: This study illustrates that a robust and comprehensive qualitative study of contextual factors across a social ecological spectrum is critical to elucidating factors that will promote future adoption and scale up of health promotion programs in primary care. Application of conceptual frameworks and health behavior theory facilitates identification of facilitators and barriers across contexts. Trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02804698 Registered on June 17, 2016.
NoteOpen access journal
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNational Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)United States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANIH National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI) [1R01HL125996-01]
- Mental health and diabetes self-management: assessing stakeholder perspectives from health centers in Northern Mexico.
- Authors: Aceves B, Ruiz M, Ingram M, Denman C, Garcia DO, Madhivanan P, Rosales C
- Issue date: 2021 Feb 25
- The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
- Authors: Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L
- Issue date: 2009
- Meta Salud Diabetes study protocol: a cluster-randomised trial to reduce cardiovascular risk among a diabetic population of Mexico.
- Authors: Sabo S, Denman Champion C, Bell ML, Cornejo Vucovich E, Ingram M, Valenica C, Castro Vasquez MDC, Gonzalez-Fagoaga E, Geurnsey de Zapien J, Rosales CB
- Issue date: 2018 Mar 12
- Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
- Authors: Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.
- Authors: Medical Advisory Secretariat.
- Issue date: 2009