Name:
Williams_MarsScarps_Revision.pdf
Size:
1.739Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary LabIssue Date
2020-01-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCECitation
Williams, J., Day, M., Chojnacki, M., & Rice, M. (2020). Scarp orientation in regions of active aeolian erosion on Mars. Icarus, 335, 113384.Journal
ICARUSRights
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The morphologies of wind-formed features on Mars provide diagnostic information about ancient and modem surface winds. Aeolian erosional features include decimeter-scale ventifacts and kilometer-scale yardangs, but intermediate-scale erosional features are less well-understood. Understanding aeolian erosion may be critical to identifying ancient martian biosignatures. Cosmogenic radiation destroys complex organic molecules during prolonged exposure at the martian surface, but outcrops freshly re-exposed by aeolian erosion provide potential sites where biosignatures could have been protected and made recently available for sampling. Wind-driven scarp retreat has been cited as the cause for young exposure ages measured in Gale crater. Upcoming exploration by the Mars 2020 rover will focus on Jezero crater, another location of extensive aeolian erosion and meter-scale scarps. This work is motivated by the hypothesis that retreating scarps on Mars may prefer orientations that reflect the direction of erosive winds. We mapped scarps in Jezero and Gale craters and compared their orientation distributions with local wind regimes interpreted from other aeolian indicators. No strong correlation between wind direction and scarp orientation was identified. The near-random distribution of scarp orientations suggests that in the locations studied the dominant processes controlling scarp orientation are either processes that do not prefer an orientation (e.g., impact or thermal fracturing processes), or that turbulent flow structures form at the scale of scarp topography and obscure the regional-scale signals of erosion with scarp-scale eddies and flow deflection.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 22 July 2019ISSN
0019-1035Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.icarus.2019.07.018