Lasting peace or temporary calm? Rebel group decapitation and civil war outcomes
Author
Ryckman, Kirssa ClineAffiliation
Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ PolicyIssue Date
2017-09-18
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
SAGE PublicationsCitation
Ryckman, K. C. (2017). Lasting peace or temporary calm? Rebel group decapitation and civil war outcomes. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 0738894217724135.Rights
© The Author(s) 2017.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Existing research has found that killing or capturing rebel group leaders can lead to the termination of civil wars. This paper considers the quality of those terminations, examining how wars end and whether this produces a lasting peace or only a temporary reprieve from violence. Decapitation is expected to weaken rebel groups, shifting the balance of power to the government; however, results suggest that killing or capturing a rebel group leader tends to produce termination through inactivity rather than outright government victories. Decapitation is also found to have no effect on the chances of civil war recurrence. This suggests that the removal of rebel group leaders is effective primarily as a short-term strategy that does not tend to generate a lasting peace.ISSN
0738-8942EISSN
1549-9219Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0738894217724135