Mixed Messages: II. Outcomes Associated with the Proportion and Placement of Negative Statements in Support Messages
Name:
2._Mixed_Messages_II_Main_Docu ...
Size:
1.096Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDCitation
Colter D. Ray, Jacquelyn Harvey, Kory Floyd, Joseph A. Bonito & Maija Reblin (2020) Mixed Messages: II. Outcomes Associated with the Proportion and Placement of Negative Statements in Support Messages, Health Communication, DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1719322Journal
HEALTH COMMUNICATIONRights
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Few studies on emotional support have investigated mixed messages - instances when emotional support messages contain both positive and negative statements. Although researchers have recognized that mixed messages occur, most supportive communication research has ignored these ambivalent messages. We contend based on the negativity bias that the more negative statements that occur in an emotional support message, the less effective the message is. To test this possibility, we presented cancer patients (N = 417) with messages that consisted of 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, or 80% negative statements. Patients rated the messages on five variables: message effectiveness, affective improvement, supporter competence, likelihood to seek future support, and being better off if the supporter had said nothing. A significant positive linear trend occurred for all five variables. The results suggest that the presence and amount of negative statements within an emotional support message has a considerable influence on the recipient's perception of the message and supporter. From a practical standpoint, the results suggest that cancer patients' supporters should act cautiously when communicating negative statements within supportive messages, as even a brief negative statement may cause irreparable damage to the overall quality of a support message.Note
18 month embargo; published online: 17 February 2020ISSN
1041-0236EISSN
1532-7027PubMed ID
32066269Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/10410236.2020.1719322
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Mixed Messages: I. The Consequences of Communicating Negative Statements Within Emotional Support Messages to Cancer Patients.
- Authors: Ray CD, Floyd K, Tietsort CJ, Veluscek AM, Otmar CD, Hashi EC, Fisher R
- Issue date: 2020 Aug
- Success Bias and Inflation Bias After Planning and Communicating Emotional Support.
- Authors: Ray CD, Floyd K, Mongeau PA, Randall AK
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- Nonsupport Versus Varying Levels of Person-Centered Emotional Support: a Study of Women with Breast Cancer.
- Authors: Ray CD, Veluscek AM
- Issue date: 2018 Jun
- Emotional Shifts in Health Messages as a Strategy for Generating Talk and Behavior Change.
- Authors: Peinado S, Nabi RL
- Issue date: 2024 Nov
