• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangelands
    • Rangelands, Volume 37 (2015)
    • Rangelands, Volume 37, Number 1 (2015)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangelands
    • Rangelands, Volume 37 (2015)
    • Rangelands, Volume 37, Number 1 (2015)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Sage-Grouse Habitat Monitoring: Daubenmire versus Line-Point Intercept

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    22375-41929-1-PB.pdf
    Size:
    1.463Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Thacker, Eric
    Messmer, Terry
    Burritt, Beth
    Issue Date
    2015-12-01
    Keywords
    monitoring
    habitat
    canopy cover
    methods comparison
    sage-grouse
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Thacker, E., Messmer, T., & Burritt, B. (2015). Sage-Grouse Habitat Monitoring: Daubenmire versus Line-Point Intercept. Rangelands, 37(1), 7-13.
    Publisher
    Society for Range Management
    Journal
    Rangelands
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/640065
    DOI
    10.1016/j.rala.2014.12.002
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org
    Abstract
    On the Ground • Evaluation of range/habitat projects for sage-grouse require careful monitoring to measure their impact. • Daubenmire canopy cover and line-point intercept did not yield similar results. • As herbaceous canopy cover increased, the differences between the cover estimates increased. • Adoption of both techniques by both groups may be the only feasible solution since institutional constraints limit either group from changing monitoring techniques.
    Type
    text
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0190-0528
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.rala.2014.12.002
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Rangelands, Volume 37, Number 1 (2015)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.