Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning-Concurrent validity of criterion A
AuthorBuer Christensen, Tore
Bender, Donna S
Skodol, Andrew E
Selvik, Sara Germans
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBuer Christensen, T., Eikenaes, I., Hummelen, B., Pedersen, G., Nysæter, T.-E., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., & Selvik, S. G. (2020). Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning—Concurrent validity of criterion A. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000352
Rights© 2019 American Psychological Association
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractThe alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), defines personality functioning by assessment of impairment in Identity and Self-direction (Self component) and in Empathy and Intimacy (Interpersonal). These four domains constitute the Level of Personality Functioning Scale, a trans-diagnostic measure of PD severity. The association between the Level of Personality Functioning Scale and psychosocial impairment based on other previously established psychosocial functioning instruments has not been reported. A total of 317 individuals, including a representative clinical sample of 282 patients (192 with a personality disorder [PD] diagnosis), was evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 AMPD Module I. Self-reported impairment was measured by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and social and occupational impairment was assessed by the functioning score of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF-F). WSAS and GAF-F both correlated significantly with mean LPFS scores and the sum of DSM-IV PD criteria. For both measures, the mean LPFS was a stronger predictor for psychosocial impairment than the sum of DSM-IV PD criteria. Within the LPFS, the Self component was a better predictor than the Interpersonal component for both WSAS and GAF-F. For the four domains, the results diverged, with Identity as the strongest predictor by far for WSAS. Empathy was the only significant predictor for impairment evaluated by GAF-F, but its contribution to variance was not substantial. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
- Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample.
- Authors: Zettl M, Volkert J, Vögele C, Herpertz SC, Kubera KM, Taubner S
- Issue date: 2020 May
- Introduction to the Special Series on the Personality Functioning Component of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.
- Authors: Bender DS, Zimmermann J, Huprich SK
- Issue date: 2018 Nov-Dec
- Examining criterion a: DSM-5 level of personality functioning as assessed through life story interviews.
- Authors: Cruitt PJ, Boudreaux MJ, King HR, Oltmanns JR, Oltmanns TF
- Issue date: 2019 May
- Assessing Criterion A in adolescents using the Semistructured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5.
- Authors: Weekers LC, Verhoeff SCE, Kamphuis JH, Hutsebaut J
- Issue date: 2020 Sep 3
- Deconstructing criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders.
- Authors: Garcia DJ, Waugh MH, Skadberg RM, Crittenden EB, Finn MTM, Schmidt MR, Kurdziel-Adams G
- Issue date: 2020 Jul 30