How Much of What We Learn in Virtual Reality Transfers to Real-World Navigation?
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Psychol
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHejtmanek, L., Starrett, M., Ferrer, E., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2020). How Much of What We Learn in Virtual Reality Transfers to Real-World Navigation?, Multisensory Research, 33(4-5), 479-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20201445
Rights© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractPast studies suggest that learning a spatial environment by navigating on a desktop computer can lead to significant acquisition of spatial knowledge, although typically less than navigating in the real world. Exactly how this might differ when learning in immersive virtual interfaces that offer a rich set of multisensory cues remains to be fully explored. In this study, participants learned a campus building environment by navigating (1) the real-world version. (2) an immersive version involving an omnidirectional treadmill and head-mounted display. or (3) a version navigated on a desktop computer with a mouse and a keyboard. Participants first navigated the building in one of the three different interfaces and, afterward, navigated the real-world building to assess information transfer. To determine how well they learned the spatial layout, we measured path length, visitation errors, and pointing errors. Both virtual conditions resulted in significant learning and transfer to the real world, suggesting their efficacy in mimicking some aspects of real-world navigation. Overall, real-world navigation outperformed both immersive and desktop navigation, effects particularly pronounced early in learning. This was also suggested in a second experiment involving transfer from the real world to immersive virtual reality (VR). Analysis of effect sizes of going from virtual conditions to the real world suggested a slight advantage for immersive VR compared to desktop in terms of transfer, although at the cost of increased likelihood of dropout. Our findings suggest that virtual navigation results in significant learning, regardless of the interface, with immersive VR providing some advantage when transferring to the real world.
Note12 month embargo; published online: 17 March 2020
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
- Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
- Authors: Srivastava P, Rimzhim A, Vijay P, Singh S, Chandra S
- Issue date: 2019
- Orientation in Virtual Reality Does Not Fully Measure Up to the Real-World.
- Authors: Kimura K, Reichert JF, Olson A, Pouya OR, Wang X, Moussavi Z, Kelly DM
- Issue date: 2017 Dec 22
- The effect of navigation method and visual display on distance perception in a large-scale virtual building.
- Authors: Li H, Mavros P, Krukar J, Hölscher C
- Issue date: 2021 May
- Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information.
- Authors: Starrett MJ, Ekstrom AD
- Issue date: 2018
- Virtual environments for the transfer of navigation skills in the blind: a comparison of directed instruction vs. video game based learning approaches.
- Authors: Connors EC, Chrastil ER, Sánchez J, Merabet LB
- Issue date: 2014