Name:
Wierzchos_2020_AJ_159_136.pdf
Size:
545.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Lab, Catalina Sky SurveyIssue Date
2020-02-28Keywords
CentaursComets
Small solar system bodies
Cometary atmospheres
Short period comets
Cometary studies
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
K. Wierzchos and M. Womack 2020 AJ 159 136Journal
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNALRights
Copyright © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann is an unusual solar system object. Originally classified as a short-period comet, it is now known as a Centaur that recently transferred to its current orbit, and may become a Jupiter family comet. It has exhibited a dust coma for over 90 yr, and regularly undergoes significant dust outbursts. Carbon monoxide is routinely detected in high amounts and is typically assumed to play a large role in generating the quiescent dust coma and outbursts. To test this hypothesis, we completed two three-month-long observing campaigns of the CO J = 2-1 rotational line using the Arizona Radio Observatory 10 m Submillimeter Telescope during 2016 and 2018-2019, and compared the results to visible magnitudes obtained at the same time. As the Centaur approached its 2019 perihelion, the quiescent dust coma grew similar to 45% in brightness, while it is unclear whether the quiescent CO production rate also increased. A doubling of the CO production rate on 2016 February 28.6 UT did not trigger an outburst nor a rise in dust production for at least 10 days. Similarly, two dust outbursts occurred in 2018 while CO production continued at quiescent rates. Two other dust outbursts may show gas involvement. The data indicate that CO and dust outbursts are not always well correlated. This may be explained if CO is not always substantially incorporated with the dust component in the nucleus, or if CO is primarily released through a porous material. Additionally, other minor volatiles or physical processes may help generate dust outbursts.ISSN
0004-6256Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-3881/ab6e68