Grassland Wildfires in the Southern Great Plains: Monitoring Ecological Impacts and Recovery
Name:
remotesensing-12-00619.pdf
Size:
3.152Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Steiner, Jean L.Wetter, Jeffrey
Robertson, Shelby
Teet, Stephen
Wang, Jie
Wu, Xiaocui
Zhou, Yuting
Brown, David
Xiao, Xiangming
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Morris K Udall & Stewart L Udall FdnIssue Date
2020-02-13
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Steiner, J.L.; Wetter, J.; Robertson, S.; Teet, S.; Wang, J.; Wu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Brown, D.; Xiao, X. Grassland Wildfires in the Southern Great Plains: Monitoring Ecological Impacts and Recovery. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 619.Journal
REMOTE SENSINGRights
Copyright © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Devastating wildfires in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas in 2016 and 2017 resulted in significant social, economic, and environmental losses, with the agricultural sector among those severely affected. Several satellite-based indices were evaluated as potential monitoring tools for post-wildfire ecological recovery and management of grasslands. All indices evaluated provided useful information and indicated rapid vegetation recovery from wildfire. The Leaf Water Stress Index (LSWI) and Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) showed a distinct response to the wildfire events, and differentiated between burned and unburned areas throughout the post-wildfire growing seasons better than the Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) and Enhanced Vegetative Index (EVI). In particular, the LSWI may provide a useful tool for mapping the footprint of wildfire, with potential utility for organizations that provide post-fire recovery resources. The GPP, which estimates the biomass productivity of vegetation, can provide information to livestock operators to guide the re-stocking of cattle in the aftermath of wildfire. In sum, satellite-based proxies can provide timely information both to characterize a wildfire's footprint and to guide post-fire grazing management in a manner that balances short term needs for forage with long-term productivity and ecological function.Note
Open access journalISSN
2072-4292Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/rs12040619
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).