Simulating Groundwater-Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci
MetadataShow full item record
CitationTran, H., Zhang, J., Cohard, J.‐M., Condon, L.E. and Maxwell, R.M. (2020), Simulating Groundwater‐Streamflow Connections in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Groundwater, 58: 392-405. doi:10.1111/gwat.13000
Rights© 2020, National Ground Water Association.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractIn mountain, snow driven catchments, snowmelt is supposed to be the primary contribution to river streamflows during spring. In these catchments the contribution of groundwater is not well documented because of the difficulty to monitor groundwater in such complex environment with deep aquifers. In this study we use an integrated hydrologic model to conduct numerical experiments that help quantify the effect of lateral groundwater flow on total annual and peak streamflow in predevelopment conditions. Our simulations focus on the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB; 2.8 × 105 km2 ) a well-documented mountain catchment for which both streamflow and water table measurements are available for several important sub-basins. For the simulated water year, our results suggest an increase in peak flow of up to 57% when lateral groundwater flow processes are included-an unexpected result for flood conditions generally assumed independent of groundwater. Additionally, inclusion of lateral groundwater flow moderately improved the model match to observations. The correlation coefficient for mean annual flows improved from 0.84 for the no lateral groundwater flow simulation to 0.98 for the lateral groundwater flow one. Spatially we see more pronounced differences between lateral and no lateral groundwater flow cases in areas of the domain with steeper topography. We also found distinct differences in the magnitude and spatial distribution of streamflow changes with and without lateral groundwater flow between Upper Colorado River Sub-basins. A sensitivity test that scaled hydraulic conductivity over two orders of magnitude was conducted for the lateral groundwater flow simulations. These results show that the impact of lateral groundwater flow is as large or larger than an order of magnitude change in hydraulic conductivity. While our results focus on the UCRB, we feel that these simulations have relevance to other headwaters systems worldwide.
Note12 month embargo; published online: 17 March 2020
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
- Climate change impacts on streamflow and subbasin-scale hydrology in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
- Authors: Ficklin DL, Stewart IT, Maurer EP
- Issue date: 2013
- Changes in Projected Spatial and Seasonal Groundwater Recharge in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
- Authors: Tillman FD, Gangopadhyay S, Pruitt T
- Issue date: 2017 Jul
- First snow, glacier and groundwater contribution quantification in the upper Mendoza River basin using stable water isotopes.
- Authors: Crespo SA, Fernandoy F, Cara L, Klarian S, Lavergne C
- Issue date: 2020 Oct - Dec
- Hydrology of the North Klondike River: carbon export, water balance and inter-annual climate influences within a sub-alpine permafrost catchment.
- Authors: Lapp A, Clark I, Macumber A, Patterson T
- Issue date: 2017 Oct
- Implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones on streamflow composition.
- Authors: von Freyberg J, Radny D, Gall HE, Schirmer M
- Issue date: 2014 Nov 15