Name:
W190929a_clean_copy.pdf
Size:
187.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & GynecolIssue Date
2020-04
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIERCitation
Cohen, W. R., & Friedman, E. A. (2020). Guidelines for Labor Assessment: Failure to Progress?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.013Rights
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 16 January 2020ISSN
0002-9378EISSN
1097-6868PubMed ID
31954702Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.013
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
- Authors: Zipori Y, Grunwald O, Ginsberg Y, Beloosesky R, Weiner Z
- Issue date: 2019 Feb
- Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
- Authors: Thuillier C, Roy S, Peyronnet V, Quibel T, Nlandu A, Rozenberg P
- Issue date: 2018 Mar
- The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia.
- Authors: Wood S, Skiffington J, Brant R, Crawford S, Hicks M, Mohammad K, Mrklas KJ, Tang S, Metcalfe A, REDUCED Trial Team
- Issue date: 2023 May
- Perils of the new labor management guidelines.
- Authors: Cohen WR, Friedman EA
- Issue date: 2015 Apr
- Assessing first-stage labor progression and its relationship to complications.
- Authors: Hamilton EF, Warrick PA, Collins K, Smith S, Garite TJ
- Issue date: 2016 Mar
