Name:
JWPE_2019_1406R1.pdf
Size:
1.166Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
AzadiAghdam, MojtabaPark, Minkyu
Lopez-Prieto, Israel J.
Achilli, Andrea
Snyder, Shane A.
Farrell, James
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Chem & Environm EngnIssue Date
2020-06Keywords
Fluidized bed crystallizationUltrafiltration
Ferric chloride coagulation and flocculation
Excitation emission matrix
Parallel factor analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ELSEVIERCitation
AzadiAghdam, M., Park, M., Lopez-Prieto, I. J., Achilli, A., Snyder, S. A., & Farrell, J. (2020). Pretreatment for water reuse using fluidized bed crystallization. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 35, [101226]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101226Rights
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This research investigated the use of fluidized bed crystallization for removing scale forming species and natural organic matter (NOM) from treated municipal wastewater prior to water reclamation. The effect of pH on Ca2+, Mg2+, silica and NOM removal in a fluidized bed crystallization reactor (FBCR) was determined. NOM removal in the FBCR was compared to that for the conventional treatments, ultrafiltration and ferric chloride coagulation/flocculation. Under optimized conditions, fluidized bed crystallization was able to remove more than 99.9 % of Mg2+, 97 % of Ca2+ and 42 % of silica. The FBCR was also able to remove 25 % of NOM, which was intermediate between NOM removal by ferric chloride (56 %) and ultrafiltration (13 %). Size exclusion chromatography-organic carbon detection (SEC-OCD) indicated that the majority of NOM removal occurred via co-precipitation with Mg(OH)(2). Excitation emission matrix-parallel factor (EEM-PARAFAC) analysis was used to investigate the types of NOM removed. The FBCR was able to remove all five NOM components (three humic acids, one fulvic acid and one protein-like substance), including 100 % of the autochthonous fulvic acids. Ferric chloride was also able to remove all five NOM components, but only one third of the autochthonous fulvic acids, while ultrafiltration was able to remove only 11 % of the protein-like NOM.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 8 March 2020ISSN
2214-7144Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
the United States National Science Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101226