Clinical Outcomes Following the Use of Archived Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotype to Guide Antiretroviral Therapy Adjustment
Author
Ellis, Kristen ENawas, George T
Chan, Connie
York, Lawrence
Fisher, Julia
Connick, Elizabeth
Zangeneh, Tirdad T
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Infect DisUniv Arizona, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci
Univ Arizona, Stat Consulting Lab, BIO5 Inst
Issue Date
2020-01Keywords
HIVAntiretroviral therapy
archived proviral HIV DNA genotype
genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing
peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INCCitation
Kristen E Ellis, George T Nawas, Connie Chan, Lawrence York, Julia Fisher, Elizabeth Connick, Tirdad T Zangeneh, Clinical Outcomes Following the Use of Archived Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotype to Guide Antiretroviral Therapy Adjustment, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2020, ofz533, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz533Journal
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASESRights
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background. Evidence regarding the safety of using proviral HIV-1 DNA genotype (DNA GT) to guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) is limited. We hypothesized that HIV RNA would not increase following ART adjustment guided by DNA G'I' in a university HIV clinic. Methods. Data were obtained from electronic medical records of adult persons living with HIV-1 (PWH) who underwent DNA GT testing and changed ART between October 2014 and November 2017. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of ART switch on HIV RNA over time. Results. Eighty-three PWH had DNA GT performed, 66 (80%) switched ART, and 59 had postswitch follow-up. Data were analyzed pre-/postswitch for these 59 PWH (median age, 54 years; 71% LWH >= 10 years; 46% >= 2 previous regimens; 36% recent low-level viremia; 34% unknown medication history). On DNA GT, 58% had >= 1-class ART resistance, 34% >= 2-class, and 10% 3-class. Median follow-up (range) was 337 (34-647) days. 'I here was no change in probability of HIV RNA 250 copies/mL over time (P > .05). At baseline, 76% had HIV RNA >= 50 vs 88% at last postswitch follow-up (P = .092). Protease inhibitor use decreased from 58% to 24% (P < .001). Average daily pills and dosing frequency decreased from 3.48 to 2.05 (P < .001) and 1.39 to 1.09 (P < .001), respectively; ART cost did not change. Conclusions. DNA GT facilitated changes in ART in a treatment-experienced population without increases in HIV RNA. Decreased pill burden occurred without increased ART cost. Further studies to identify optimal use of DNA GT are needed.Note
Open access journalISSN
2328-8957PubMed ID
31915714Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/ofid/ofz533
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).