Alternative Treatments for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women - A Systematic Review
dc.contributor.author | McCann, Lelan | |
dc.creator | McCann, Lelan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-17T01:30:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-17T01:30:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/641617 | |
dc.description | A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine. | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Many postmenopausal women desire non-pharmaceutical alternatives to bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention strategies against osteoporosis. Although highly effective in the treatment of osteoporosis, bisphosphonates have a serious side effect profile. These side effects limit the use and duration of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis, thus revealing the need for alternative therapies for osteoporosis. Methods: The systematic review was conducted by searching the electronic database of PubMed/MEDLINE using the MeSH terms “postmenopausal osteoporosis” and “vitamins” from January 1961 to April 2019. The review included randomized controlled trials that studied the effects of vitamin supplementation on bone turnover markers and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with or without osteoporosis. The articles selected for use in this review were assessed for quality using an assessing instrument developed by Jadad et al (1). Results: Twelve articles were included in the final systematic review. These studies showed that vitamin supplements, soy isoflavones, or probiotics decreased the measured markers of bone turnover in studies with a treatment period ranging from 84 days to 48 months. Discussion: Supplementation with probiotic supplements, folic acid, vitamin K, calcium, and phytochemicals with vitamins D and K are shown to be beneficial to bone health with evidence that bone turnover markers are decreased in these treatment groups, although these findings demonstrate that vitamin or probiotic supplementation are not effective in increasing bone mineral density. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | |
dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the College of Medicine - Phoenix, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Global Health | |
dc.subject | Osteoporosis | |
dc.subject | post-menopausal | |
dc.subject | osteoporosis treatment | |
dc.subject.mesh | Obstetrics | |
dc.subject.mesh | Gynecology | |
dc.title | Alternative Treatments for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women - A Systematic Review | |
dc.type | text | |
dc.type | Electronic Thesis | |
dc.type | Poster | |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the College of Medicine - Phoenix Scholarly Projects 2020 collection. For more information, contact the Phoenix Biomedical Campus Library at pbc-library@email.arizona.edu. | |
dc.contributor.mentor | Beyda, David | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-06-17T01:30:33Z |