Author
Madurowicz, AlexanderMacintosh, Bruce
Chilcote, Jeffrey
Perrin, Marshall
Poyneer, Lisa
Pueyo, Laurent
Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste
Bailey, Vanessa P.
Barman, Travis
Bulger, Joanna
Cotten, Tara
De Rosa, Robert J.
Doyon, Rene
Duchêne, Gaspard
Esposito, Thomas M.
Fitzgerald, Michael P.
Follette, Katherine B.
Gerard, Benjamin L.
Goodsell, Stephen J.
Graham, James R.
Greenbaum, Alexandra Z.
Hibon, Pascale
Hung, Li-Wei
Ingraham, Patrick
Kalas, Paul
Konopacky, Quinn
Maire, Jérôme
Marchis, Franck
Marley, Mark S.
Marois, Christian
Metchev, Stanimir
Millar-Blanchaer, Maxwell A.
Nielsen, Eric L.
Oppenheimer, Rebecca
Palmer, David
Patience, Jennifer
Rajan, Abhijith
Rameau, Julien
Rantakyrö, Fredrik T.
Savransky, Dmitry
Sivaramakrishnan, Anand
Song, Inseok
Soummer, Remi
Tallis, Melissa
Thomas, Sandrine
Wang, Jason J.
Ward-Duong, Kimberly
Wolff, Schuyler
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary LabIssue Date
2019-10-25
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Madurowicz, A., Macintosh, B., Chilcote, J., Perrin, M., Poyneer, L., Pueyo, L., ... & Wolff, S. (2019). Asymmetries in adaptive optics point spread functions. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 5(4), 049003.Rights
Copyright © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
An explanation for the origin of asymmetry along the preferential axis of the point spread function (PSF) of an AO system is developed. When phase errors from high-altitude turbulence scintillate due to Fresnel propagation, wavefront amplitude errors may be spatially offset from residual phase errors. These correlated errors appear as asymmetry in the image plane under the Fraunhofer condition. In an analytic model with an open-loop AO system, the strength of the asymmetry is calculated for a single mode of phase aberration, which generalizes to two dimensions under a Fourier decomposition of the complex illumination. Other parameters included are the spatial offset of the AO correction, which is the wind velocity in the frozen flow regime multiplied by the effective AO time delay and propagation distance or altitude of the turbulent layer. In this model, the asymmetry is strongest when the wind is slow and nearest to the coronagraphic mask when the turbulent layer is far away, such as when the telescope is pointing low toward the horizon. A great emphasis is made about the fact that the brighter asymmetric lobe of the PSF points in the opposite direction as the wind, which is consistent analytically with the clarification that the image plane electric field distribution is actually the inverse Fourier transform of the aperture plane. Validation of this understanding is made with observations taken from the Gemini Planet Imager, as well as being reproducible in end-to-end AO simulations. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.Note
Open access articleISSN
2329-4124Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1117/1.jatis.5.4.049003
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.

