Separating families, recuperating the “nation-as-family”: Migrant youth and the cultural politics of shame
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Educ Leadership & Educ Policy Studies & PracticeUniv Arizona, Carey Inst Global Good, Refugee Educator Acad, Educ Leadership
Univ Arizona, Inst LGBT Studies
Univ Arizona, Carey Inst Global Good, Refugee Educator Acad, Educ Leadership
Issue Date
2020-05-25
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Chang, E., Koyama, J., & Kasper, J. (2020). Separating families, recuperating the “nation-as-family”: Migrant youth and the cultural politics of shame. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 84. doi: 10.14507/epaa.28.5078Rights
Copyright © The Author(s), licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This study investigates the intersections of policy, affect, and the lives of migrant youth. We approach the Trump Administration's contingent reversal of a "zero tolerance" family separation policy as an illustrative case for understanding how affect mediates policy-making processes. Combining Critical Policy Analysis (CPA) and affect studies, we analyze 184 print media texts between the declaration of zero tolerance (May 2018) and President Trump's repeal of his executive order (June 2018). We argue that mainstream media invited publics to sympathize with migrant youth and shame zero tolerance policy and its defenders. While shame catalyzed nationwide #KeepFamiliesTogether protests, it also animated political actions that recuperated "America" as a tolerant nation (e.g., "Love, not hate, makes America great"). In doing so, shame suppressed structural critiques of U.S. state violence toward migrant as well as Black, Indigenous, and minoritized families and youth. We conclude by discussing how a "pedagogy of discomfort" offers one way to build toward more historically responsive and intersectional coalitions for migrant and education justice.Note
Open access journalISSN
1068-2341Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.14507/epaa.28.5078
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s), licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).

