The Lived Experience of Full-Time Non-Tenure Track Faculty: Who They Are, What They Do, and Why They Do It

Abstract

The rise of Non-Tenure Track Faculty (NTTF) in higher education is a well-researched topic, yet the research fails to disaggregate the data and findings between Full-Time NTTF and Part-Time NTTF. Very little research has been conducted on the work lives of Full-Time NTTF, and this research sought to make a small contribution toward that end. This study explored the lived experiences and motivation of FTNTTF with a focus on what aspects of their work life supported or thwarted their efforts. Based on a review of the literature, this study used an IPA methodology and viewed the issue through the theoretical lens of Self-Determination Theory using Seidman’s three-part interview process to gather the material. The findings revealed that this segment of the faculty demonstrate high levels of competence and professionalism, display ambivalence toward the promotion schedule, often have their own research agendas, and feel autonomous but also vulnerable. The findings support the recommendation to clarify promotion and pay structures and keep them consistent across departments, to decrease the emphasis on student evaluations of instructors, and to acknowledge and value them as equal colleagues in their departments. Future research could explore the impact this segment of the faculty has on student outcomes and scrutinize institutional policies that affect their engagement and participation in professional committees and governance.