Assessing XMT‐Measurement Variability of Air‐Water Interfacial Areas in Natural Porous Media
Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Araujo, J. B., & Brusseau, M. L. (2020). Assessing xmt-measurement variability of air-water interfacial areas in natural porous media. Water Resources Research, 56, e2019WR025470. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025470Journal
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCHRights
Copyright © 2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This study investigates the accuracy and reproducibility of air-water interfacial areas measured with high-resolution synchrotron X-ray microtomography (XMT). Columns packed with one of two relatively coarse-grained monodisperse granular media, glass beads or a well-sorted quartz sand, were imaged over several years, encompassing changes in acquisition equipment, improved image quality, and enhancements to image acquisition and to processing software. For the glass beads, the specific solid surface area (SSSA-XMT) of 31.6 +/- 1 cm(-1) determined from direct analysis of the segmented solid-phase image data is statistically identical to the independently calculated geometric smooth-sphere specific solid surface area (GSSA, 32 +/- 1 cm(-1)) and to the measured SSSA (28 +/- 3 cm(-1)) obtained with the N-2-Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller method. The maximum specific air-water interfacial area (A(max)) is 27.4 (+/- 2) cm(-1), which compares very well to the SSSA-XMT, GSSA, and SSSA-N-2-Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller values. For the sand, the SSSA-XMT (111 +/- 2 cm(-1)) and GSSA (113 +/- 1 cm(-1)) are similar. The mean A(max) is 96 +/- 5 cm(-1), which compares well to both the SSSA and the GSSA values. The XMT-SSSA values deviated from the GSSA values by 7-16% for the first four experiments but were essentially identical for the later experiments. This indicates that enhancements in image acquisition and processing improved data accuracy. The Amax values ranged from 74 cm(-1) to 101 cm(-1), with a coefficient of variation (COV) of 9%. The maximum capillary interfacial area ranged from 12 cm(-1) to 19 cm(-1), for a COV of 10%. The COVs for both decreased to 5-6% for the latter five experiments. These results demonstrate that XMT imaging provides accurate and reproducible measurements of total and capillary interfacial areas.Note
6 month embargo; published online: 7 January 2020ISSN
0043-1397Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2019wr025470
