Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWebb, Stephen L.
dc.contributor.authorDzialak, Matthew R.
dc.contributor.authorKosciuch, Karl L.
dc.contributor.authorWinstead, Jeffrey B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T06:34:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T06:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-01
dc.identifier.citationWebb, S. L., Dzialak, M. R., Kosciuch, K. L., & Winstead, J. B. (2013). Winter resource selection by mule deer on the Wyoming–Colorado border prior to wind energy development. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(4), 419-427.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/REM-D-12-00065.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642728
dc.description.abstractAreas identified as winter range are important seasonal habitats for mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) because they can moderate overwinter mortality by providing thermal cover and forage. Therefore, identifying seasonally important resources is a conservation priority, especially when sensitive areas are proposed for development. We used data collected from global positioning system (GPS) collars fitted on female mule deer (n=19; one location every 3 h) to identify resources important during winter (23 February 2011-30 April 2011; 1 November 2011-15 January 2012) in a region spanning southern Wyoming and northern Colorado that has been proposed for wind energy development. The study period included portions of two consecutive winters but were pooled for analysis. We used methods to account for GPS biases, fractal analyses to determine perceived spatial scale, and discrete choice models and conditional logistic regression to assess resource selection prior to development (i.e., baseline data). Resource selection by female mule deer revealed similar patterns between active (0600-1800 hours) and nonactive (2100-0300 hours) periods. Deer selected most strongly for proximity to rock outcrops and shrubland and average values of slope. Deer tended to avoid roads and grasslands; all other landscape features had minimal influence on resource selection (hazard ratios near, or overlapping, 1). Using the fixed-effects coefficient estimates, we developed two spatially explicit maps that depicted probability of mule deer occurrence across the landscape. Based on an independent validation sample, each map (active and nonactive) validated well with a greater percentage of locations occurring in the two highest probability of use bins. These maps offer guidance to managing mule deer populations, conserving important seasonal habitats, and mitigating development (e.g., wind energy) in areas identified as important to mule deer.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcrucial range
dc.subjectdiscrete choice model
dc.subjectfractal analysis
dc.subjectglobal positioning systems
dc.subjectOdocoileus hemionus
dc.subjectresource selection function
dc.titleWinter Resource Selection by Mule Deer on the Wyoming-Colorado Border Prior to Wind Energy Development
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume66
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage419-427
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T06:34:18Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
23442-45156-1-PB.pdf
Size:
2.187Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record