Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteele, Jordan R.
dc.contributor.authorRashford, Benjamin S.
dc.contributor.authorFoulke, Thomas K.
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, John A.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, David T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T06:35:12Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T06:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01
dc.identifier.citationSteele, J. R., Rashford, B. S., Foulke, T. K., Tanaka, J. A., & Taylor, D. T. (2013). Wolf (Canis lupus) predation impacts on livestock production: direct effects, indirect effects, and implications for compensation ratios. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(5), 539-544.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/REM-D-13-00031.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642740
dc.description.abstractGrowing wolf (Canis lupus L.) populations in the US Rocky Mountain Region have increased conflicts between livestock production and wolf conservation. Given that the costs of large carnivore conservation are disproportionately borne by local livestock producers, the United States uses compensation for wolf damage to reduce conflicts and mediate negative attitudes toward the predators. Current compensation programs, however, only consider the direct effects of wolf predation. Indirect effects, such as wolf effects on weaning weights, and conception rates, may also reduce profitability. By not including indirect wolf effects, compensation programs may systematically undercompensate ranchers. We use a stochastic budget model of a representative cow-calf ranch in northwest Wyoming to estimate the economic impact of both direct (death loss and injured calves) and indirect effects (decreased weaning weights, decreased conception rates, and increased cattle sickness) of wolf predation. Our results suggest that short-run (i.e., year-to-year) financial impacts of wolf indirect effects may be as large as or larger than the direct effects. Including indirect effects implies that the compensation ratio (i.e., number of calves compensated per confirmed depredation) necessary to fully offset the financial impacts of wolves would need to be two to three times larger than current 7:1 compensation ratio used in Wyoming.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcattle production
dc.subjectcompensation
dc.subjecteconomics
dc.subjectpredation
dc.subjectwildlife damage
dc.subjectwolves
dc.titleWolf (Canis lupus) Predation Impacts on Livestock Production: Direct Effects, Indirect Effects, and Implications for Compensation Ratios
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume66
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage539-544
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T06:35:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
23460-45233-1-PB.pdf
Size:
239.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record