Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRissman, Adena R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T06:50:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T06:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2010-03-01
dc.identifier.citationRissman, A. R. (2010). Designing perpetual conservation agreements for land management. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 63(2), 167-175.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/08-251.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642775
dc.description.abstractConservation initiatives on working ranches balance flexibility for land management with restrictions to ensure protection over time. Conservation easements are a common tool for range conservation, but the perpetual nature of their individually negotiated rights and restrictions may present a challenge for adaptive land management. The evolution of conservation easement approaches to land management was addressed in a review of 52 grazing easements created by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in California rangelands between 1973 and 2006 as well as through interviews with TNC staff. Easement terms related to land management increased in complexity over time, particularly for purchased easements on private land. Easements commonly contained restrictions on riparian or wetland management (58%), residual dry matter (50%), and type of animal permitted (46%) but rarely restricted number of cattle or animal unit months (4%). Flexibility was provided by easement terms such as exceptions for drought years and reference to best management practices, the easement holder’s administrative discretion, and easement amendment. Interviews with TNC staff revealed an iterative process in which conservation easements remain relatively fixed once they are established, whereas subsequent easements incorporate lessons learned from easement monitoring, enforcement, management, and applicable science. Conservation easements with an adaptive approach would link compliance terms with conservation goals, require monitoring of those terms, and have a mechanism for altering land management based on monitoring results. All three of these realms present challenges for the conservation easement structure. Improvements could be made in easement terms, ecological monitoring, and stewardship to improve the effectiveness and adaptability of this tool for maintaining ecological function on working ranches. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectCalifornia oak woodlands
dc.subjectgrazing policy
dc.subjectland conservation
dc.subjectland trusts
dc.subjectpolicy instruments
dc.subjectrange management
dc.subjectresidual dry matter
dc.subjectworking landscapes
dc.titleDesigning Perpetual Conservation Agreements for Land Management
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume63
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage167-175
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T06:50:58Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20021-34801-1-PB.pdf
Size:
371.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record