Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHillhouse, Heidi L.
dc.contributor.authorTunnell, Susan J.
dc.contributor.authorStubbendieck, James
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T06:53:39Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T06:53:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-01
dc.identifier.citationHillhouse, H. L., Tunnell, S. J., & Stubbendieck, J. (2010). Spring grazing impacts on the vegetation of reed canarygrass–invaded wetlands. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 63(5), 581-587.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/REM-D-09-00173.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642821
dc.description.abstractThe Rainwater Basin region in Nebraska is critically important stopover habitat for spring waterfowl migrations, but the ability of these sites to produce sufficient food for migrating waterfowl is endangered by the invasion of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). This species produces thick litter layers and abundant aboveground biomass, reducing germination and seedling survival of the annual plant species responsible for much of the seed production in the area. Cattle grazing often is used as a management tool in the Rainwater Basin to slow or reverse reed canarygrass invasion and to improve growing conditions for more desirable plant species. However, there has been little research on the impact of grazing on these factors. We studied the impacts of one-time, early-season (between April and June) cattle grazing on the abundance of reed canarygrass, bare ground, and litter. We hypothesized that cattle grazing would result in reduced reed canarygrass by the end of the 2-yr study, and that grazing would increase the abundance of bare ground and decrease the abundance of litter. Because grazing was expected to improve conditions for seed germination, we expected to find higher species richness in grazed areas. We found that grazing did not reduce the abundance of reed canarygrass, but the application of early-season grazing for two consecutive years did reduce litter and increase bare ground. Litter abundance decreased by 7.5% in ungrazed plots and litter increased by 8.6% in grazed plots. Bare ground in grazed plots increased 10.7% in grazed plots but decreased 1.2% in ungrazed plots. Species richness was not affected by grazing during this study. We concluded that grazing, as utilized in this study, is not sufficient to reduce reed canarygrass abundance, but can be used to mitigate some of the negative impacts of reed canarygrass invasion. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectinvasive species
dc.subjectPhalaris arundinacea L.
dc.subjectRainwater Basin
dc.subjectwaterfowl habitat
dc.subjectwetland management
dc.titleSpring Grazing Impacts on the Vegetation of Reed Canarygrass-Invaded Wetlands
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume63
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage581-587
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T06:53:39Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20069-34949-1-PB.pdf
Size:
407.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record