Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Mirazo, Jabier
dc.contributor.authorBishop-Hurley, Greg J.
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Dave L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:01:40Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:01:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01
dc.identifier.citationRuiz-Mirazo, J., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., & Swain, D. L. (2011). Automated animal control: Can discontinuous monitoring and aversive stimulation modify cattle grazing behavior?. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 64(3), 240-248.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/REM-D-10-00087.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642863
dc.description.abstractGrazing livestock freely select landscape resources, unless they are herded or constrained by fences. Automated animal control (AAC) systems offer an alternative to physical fences by using animal-positioning technology and aversive stimuli to deter animals from staying in sensitive environments and so limit their impact. This paper reports on a replicated field experiment completed to test whether occasional stimuli (audio cue followed by a mild electric stimulus), delivered by discontinuously activated AAC collars, could suffice to modify the grazing behavior of groups of cattle. Four groups of eight steers were confined in 8-ha rectangular paddocks that had an ad libitum supplement feeder located in one end to attract cattle. The steers’ positional information was recorded continuously for 3 d using a GPS receiver encased in a collar fitted around their neck. These data were used to characterize their use of the paddocks without intervention. Subsequently a restriction zone was activated on the collars. This zone contained the supplement feeders and represented approximately 10% of the paddock area. Cattle movement was again monitored during a second 3-d period, in which the steers were subjected to discontinuous aversive stimuli (5 min of stimulation followed by a random 0-30 min interval without stimulation) if they were located inside or moved into the restriction zone. Cattle visits to the restriction zone were shorter and the return interval longer when steers were subjected to discontinuous stimulation. Overall, there was a 97% reduction in the use of the restriction zone between the first and second deployments. These results suggest that grazing impact can be drastically reduced by making a zone less desirable through discontinuous aversive stimulation. Such a discontinuous (25% of the time on) AAC system can reduce power consumption in collars and so help overcome energy supply limitations that hinder commercial AAC applications.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectanimal distribution
dc.subjectavoidance behavior
dc.subjectelectronic collars
dc.subjectgrazing impacts
dc.subjectlandscape preference index
dc.subjectvirtual fencing
dc.titleAutomated Animal Control: Can Discontinuous Monitoring and Aversive Stimulation Modify Cattle Grazing Behavior?
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume64
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage240-248
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:01:40Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
20246-35584-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.377Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record