Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBates, Jonathan D.
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Edward C.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Kirk W.
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:17:04Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:17:04Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBates, J. D., Rhodes, E. C., Davies, K. W., & Sharp, R. (2009). Postfire succession in big sagebrush steppe with livestock grazing. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 62(1), 98-110.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/08-096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643009
dc.description.abstractPrescribed fire in rangeland ecosystems is applied for a variety of management objectives, including enhancing productivity of forage species for domestic livestock. In the big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) steppe of the western United States, fire has been a natural and prescribed disturbance, temporarily shifting vegetation from shrub-grass codominance to grass dominance. There is limited information on the impacts of grazing to community dynamics following fire in big sagebrush steppe. This study evaluated cattle grazing impacts over four growing seasons after prescribed fire on Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata subsp. Wyomingensis [Beetle Young] Welsh) steppe in eastern Oregon. Treatments included no grazing on burned and unburned sagebrush steppe, two summer-grazing applications after fire, and two spring-grazing applications after fire. Treatment plots were burned in fall 2002. Grazing trials were applied from 2003 to 2005. Vegetation dynamics in the treatments were evaluated by quantifying herbaceous canopy cover, density, annual yield, and perennial grass seed yield. Seed production was greater in the ungrazed burn treatments than in all burn-grazed treatments; however, these differences did not affect community recovery after fire. Other herbaceous response variables (cover, density, composition, and annual yield), bare ground, and soil surface litter did not differ among grazed and ungrazed burn treatments. All burn treatments (grazed and ungrazed) had greater herbaceous cover, herbaceous standing crop, herbaceous annual yield, and grass seed production than the unburned treatment by the second or third year after fire. The results demonstrated that properly applied livestock grazing after low-severity, prescribed fire will not hinder the recovery of herbaceous plant communities in Wyoming big sagebrush steppe. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectbunchgrass
dc.subjectIdaho fescue
dc.subjectprescribed burning
dc.subjectsecondary succession
dc.subjectThurber’s needlegrass
dc.subjectutilization
dc.subjectWyoming big sagebrush
dc.titlePostfire Succession in Big Sagebrush Steppe With Livestock Grazing
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume62
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage98-110
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:17:04Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19922-34519-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.134Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record