Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorToombs, Theodore P.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Martha G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:18:36Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:18:36Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-01
dc.identifier.citationToombs, T. P., & Roberts, M. G. (2009). Are natural resources conservation service range management investments working at cross-purposes with wildlife habitat goals on western United States rangelands?. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 62(4), 351-355.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/08-027.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643039
dc.description.abstractWildlife conservationists and agencies have recommended managing rangelands for vegetation heterogeneity to improve wildlife habitat, particularly for many grassland birds. However, range management focuses on livestock production and associated practices and structural items (fences, water developments) that are applied to improve livestock distribution. This article assesses the occurrence of livestock distribution-oriented grazing management in the spending and applied practices of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the federal agency charged with assisting private landowners with implementation of US Department of Agriculture conservation programs. NRCS applied practices and spending both suggest an emphasis on livestock distribution and associated structures, with almost 20 million ha of prescribed grazing systems, 10 000 km of fence, and 127 000 water facilities implemented in 17 western states with assistance from NRCS programs between 2004 and 2007. Ninety percent of funding for 2005 Conservation Security Program grazing enhancements supported investments or management related to livestock distribution. We suggest that increasing the emphasis of NRCS conservation programs and financial assistance on maintaining or increasing compositional and structural heterogeneity of vegetation, rather than on livestock distribution, could be an approach that unifies livestock production and wildlife habitat objectives. In particular, including vegetation heterogeneity as a central goal for upland wildlife habitat management could be a key opportunity to increase incentives for heterogeneity-promoting management on privately owned rangeland. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectecosystem heterogeneity
dc.subjectgrassland birds
dc.subjectgrazing management
dc.subjectgrazing systems
dc.subjectland management policy
dc.subjectlivestock distribution
dc.subjectrangeland policy
dc.subjectwildlife management
dc.titleAre Natural Resources Conservation Service Range Management Investments Working at Cross-Purposes With Wildlife Habitat Goals on Western United States Rangelands?
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume62
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage351-355
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:18:36Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19964-34629-1-PB.pdf
Size:
122.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record