Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmart, Alexander J.
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Barry H
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Patricia S.
dc.contributor.authorXu, Lan
dc.contributor.authorGates, Roger N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:39:49Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2007-03-01
dc.identifier.citationSmart, A. J., Dunn, B. H., Johnson, P. S., Xu, L., & Gates, R. N. (2007). Using weather data to explain herbage yield on three Great Plains plant communities. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 60(2), 146-153.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/05-099R4.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643140
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the drivers that account for plant production allows for a better understanding of plant communities and the transitions within ecological sites and can assist managers in making informed decisions about stocking rates and timing of grazing. We compared climatic drivers of herbage production for 3 plant communities of the Clayey ecological site in southwestern South Dakota: the midgrass community dominated by western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii [Rybd.] A. Love); the mixed-grass community codominated by western wheatgrass, blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis [H.B.K.] Lag. Ex Griffiths), and buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides [Nutt.] Engelm.); and the shortgrass community dominated by blue grama and buffalograss. We used herbage yield and weather data for the period 1945-1960 collected at the South Dakota State University Range and Livestock Research Station near Cottonwood, South Dakota, to develop stepwise regression models for each plant community. Midgrass herbage production was best predicted by current-year spring (April-June) precipitation, number of calendar days until the last spring day with minimum temperature 18C, and previous-year spring precipitation (R2 = 0.81). Mixed-grass herbage production was best predicted by current-year spring precipitation and days until the last spring freeze (R2 = 0.69). Shortgrass herbage production was best predicted by current-year spring precipitation (R2 = 0.52). Midgrass plant communities were, overall, 650 kg ha-1 (SE = 92 kg ha-1) more productive (P < 0.01) than mixed- or shortgrass plant communities given the same climatic inputs. Our study enables managers to make timely informed decisions regarding stocking rates and timing of grazing on this ecological site in western South Dakota. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectclimate
dc.subjectecological sites
dc.subjectproduction
dc.subjectproduction drivers
dc.titleUsing Weather Data to Explain Herbage Yield on Three Great Plains Plant Communities
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume60
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage146-153
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:39:49Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19740-33986-1-PB.pdf
Size:
153.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record