Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHershdorfer, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Giminez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorHowery, Larry D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:44:21Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2007-05-01
dc.identifier.citationHershdorfer, M. E., Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., & Howery, L. D. (2007). Key attributes influence the performance of local weed management programs in the southwest United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 60(3), 225-234.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/1551-5028(2007)60[225:KAITPO]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643152
dc.description.abstractIn the southwestern United States, local weed management programs are increasingly important in weed prevention and control; however, little is known about the effectiveness of different local approaches to weed management. We surveyed coordinators of 53 local weed management programs in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah to determine how 4 key program attributes (interagency coordination, volunteer participation, regulatory authority and enforcement, and the state in which the program was located) were related with 4 performance measures: weed control, public education and outreach, weed monitoring, and integrated weed management. Based on the responses of 42 program coordinators (79%) we found that 1) weed programs that coordinated their activities with other organizations and those with citizen volunteers conducted more monitoring, but programs that did not coordinate or use volunteers treated more of their infested acreage; 2) programs that used a light-handed regulatory approach conducted more weed control than those with more punitive enforcement regimes or no enforcement authority; and 3) Colorado programs conducted more outreach and education than did programs in the other 3 states. Thus, although volunteer involvement and interagency coordination contributed to the performance of the local weed programs studied, particularly in monitoring, they have not compensated for the lack of locally enforceable weed regulations or adequate funding. Successful weed management in southwestern United States will require adequately funded, locally adapted approaches supported by locally enforceable weed regulations. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcommunity-based natural resource management
dc.subjectcollective action problem
dc.subjectinvasive plants
dc.titleKey Attributes Influence the Performance of Local Weed Management Programs in the Southwest United States
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume60
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage225-234
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:44:21Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19753-34029-1-PB.pdf
Size:
173.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record