Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoundy, Bruce A.
dc.contributor.authorHardegree, Stuart P.
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Jeanne C.
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T07:46:47Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T07:46:47Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-01
dc.identifier.citationRoundy, B. A., Hardegree, S. P., Chambers, J. C., & Whittaker, A. (2007). Prediction of cheatgrass field germination potential using wet thermal accumulation. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 60(6), 613-623.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/05-206R3.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643201
dc.description.abstractInvasion and dominance of weedy species is facilitated or constrained by environmental and ecological factors that affect resource availability during critical life stages. We compared the relative effects of season, annual weather, site, and disturbance on potential cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) germination in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) communities. Soil water status and temperature in the seedbed were measured continuously for 4 years on 9 big sagebrush sites in Nevada and Utah. Field plots at lower-, middle-, and upper-elevation sites were either undisturbed, or were burned, sprayed with herbicide, or both sprayed and burned. Spraying removed perennial herbaceous vegetation, whereas burning removed sagebrush. We used thermal-germination data from laboratory incubation studies of 18 cheatgrass seedlots and field soil moisture and temperature measurements to model and predict potential germination in the field plots for periods when seedbeds were continuously wet (above –0.5, –1, or –1.5 MPa) and across intermittent wet and dry periods. Season had the greatest effect on potential cheatgrass germination, followed by annual weather, and site variables (elevation and location); the effects of disturbance were minimal. Potential germination was predicted for most sites and years in spring, a majority of sites and years in fall, and few sites or years in winter. Even though disturbance has limited effects on potential germination, it can increase cheatgrass invasion and dominance by reducing perennial herbaceous species resource use and allowing increased cheatgrass growth and reproduction. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectbig sagebrush
dc.subjectdisturbance
dc.subjectfire
dc.subjectGreat Basin
dc.subjectheat accumulation
dc.subjectsoil temperature
dc.subjectsoil water
dc.subjectthermal-germination models
dc.subjectweed invasion
dc.titlePrediction of Cheatgrass Field Germination Potential Using Wet Thermal Accumulation
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume60
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage613-623
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T07:46:47Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19797-34168-1-PB.pdf
Size:
503.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record