Wyoming Big Sagebrush Recovery and Understory Response With Tebuthiuron Control
Issue Date
2005-01-01Keywords
Artemisia tridentata ssp. Wyomingensis Beetle and Youngsagebrush control
succession
brush control
overstory-understory relationships
range improvement
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
McDaniel, K. C., Torell, L. A., & Ochoa, C. G. (2005). Wyoming big sagebrush recovery and understory response with tebuthiuron control. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58(1), 65-76.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Rangeland Ecology & ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Field data collected over a 20-year period at 8 sites in northwestern New Mexico was used to determine Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis Beetle and Young) recovery following control with tebuthiuron (N-[5-(1,1- dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N-N9-dimethylurea) and to relate understory perennial grass yield to overstory canopy cover. Tebuthiuron killed between 80% and 95% of mature Wyoming big sagebrush plants within 18 months of chemical treatment, but through recruitment plant numbers equaled or exceeded pretreatment density (plants/m2) at 3 of the 8 sites and were increasing at other locations near the study’s end. Wyoming big sagebrush canopy cover averaged <2% the first 10 years after herbicide treatment but had returned to near pretreatment levels (>15%) at 2 sites, to between 5% and 10% at 4 sites, and to less than 3% at the remaining 2 sites. Treatment life was projected to exceed 35 years for 6 of the 8 study sites. Higher rates of tebuthiuron generally extended treatment life. Annual average perennial grass yield increased on treated areas relative to untreated rangeland at all study sites over the 20-year study period. Grass yield was highly variable between years, with pronounced increases when weather and environmental conditions were favorable for grass growth. A nonlinear S-shaped curve best described overstory-understory relationships and also defined the time path of Wyoming big sagebrush recovery, which differed by study site.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58%3C65:WBSRAU%3E2.0.CO;2
