Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUngar, Eugene D.
dc.contributor.authorHenkin, Zalmen
dc.contributor.authorGutman, Mario
dc.contributor.authorDolev, Amit
dc.contributor.authorGenizi, Avraham
dc.contributor.authorGanskopp, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T21:18:46Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T21:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2005-05-01
dc.identifier.citationUngar, E. D., Henkin, Z., Gutman, M., Dolev, A., Genizi, A., & Ganskopp, D. (2005). Inference of animal activity from GPS collar data on free-ranging cattle. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58(3), 256-266.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[256:IOAAFG]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643261
dc.description.abstractGlobal positioning systems (GPSs) enable continuous and automatic tracking of an animal’s position. The value of such spatial-temporal information can be improved if the corresponding activity of the animal is known. We evaluated the potential of Lotek GPS collars to predict activity of beef cattle on extensive rangeland in 2 contrasting foraging environments. Collars were configured to record animal location at intervals of 20 minutes (United States) or 5 minutes (Israel), together with counts from 2 motion sensors. Synchronized field observations of collared cows were conducted in 1999 (United States) and in 2002 and 2003 (Israel). Grazing, traveling (without grazing), and resting activities were recorded as minutes out of 20 for each category (United States), or as a single category (Israel). For the US data, stepwise regression models of grazing, traveling, and resting time accounted for 74%-84% of the variation, on the basis of the motion sensor counts for the left-right axis and the distances between GPS fixes. Regression tree analysis of grazing time yielded a simple model (4 splits) that accounted for 85% of the variation. For the Israeli data, the misclassification rates obtained by discriminant analysis and classification tree analysis of animal activity were 14% and 12%, respectively. In both analyses, almost all grazing observations were correctly classified, but other activities were sometimes misclassified as grazing. Distance alone is a poor indicator of animal activity, but grazing, traveling,and resting activities of free-ranging cattle can be inferred with reasonable accuracy from data provided by Lotek GPS collars. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectglobal positioning systems
dc.subjectforaging behavior
dc.subjectgrazing time
dc.subjectmotion sensors
dc.subjectclassification and regression trees
dc.titleInference of Animal Activity From GPS Collar Data on Free-Ranging Cattle
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.description.admin-noteLegacy DOIs that must be preserved: 10.2458/azu_rangelands_v58i3_gutman
dc.source.volume58
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage256-266
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T21:18:46Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19072-31913-1-PB.pdf
Size:
357.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record