Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKreuter, Urs P.
dc.contributor.authorAmestoy, Heidi E.
dc.contributor.authorKothmann, Mort M.
dc.contributor.authorUeckert, Darrell N.
dc.contributor.authorMcGinty, W. Allan
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Scott R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T21:19:07Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T21:19:07Z
dc.date.issued2005-05-01
dc.identifier.citationKreuter, U. P., Amestoy, H. E., Kothmann, M. M., Ueckert, D. N., McGinty, W. A., & Cummings, S. R. (2005). The use of brush management methods: a Texas landowner survey. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58(3), 284-291.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[284:TUOBMM]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643265
dc.description.abstractAdoption of effective brush management methods is critical to achieving many rangeland management objectives. However, landowners have often been reluctant to adopt new practices. In April 2000, a questionnaire was mailed to the 1058 landowners in 48 Texas counties to identify factors that influence land management decisions, especially with respect to brush management practices, including Brush Busters treatments. Brush Busters is a Texas-based program developed to expedite the adoption of ‘‘select’’ individual plant treatments through the use of environmentally safe methods. Overall, landowners were ‘‘neutral’’ to ‘‘dissatisfied’’ with regard to the amount of brush on their land. Two primary reasons for wanting to decrease brush were to increase forage production and to conserve water. Kind of brush and cost of brush control were important factors determining the preferred treatment type. In general, the most effective methods were considered to be mechanical treatments for juniper (Juniperus ashei) and individual plant herbicide treatments for mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) and prickly pear (Opuntiaspp.). Mechanical treatments and aerial herbicide applications were perceived to be the most expensive methods, followed by individual plant herbicide treatments, and fire was considered to be the least expensive method. Our study indicated that landowners’ satisfaction with Brush Busters’ select methods will likely result in an increase in the use of individual plant herbicide treatments for controlling brush. Our study emphasized that a key for enhancing the adoption of sound rangeland management practices is the development and effective dissemination of user-friendly information about low-cost techniques that produce quick results. Easily visible demonstration sites and the establishment of cooperative groups could accelerate the adoption of such practices. 
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectBrush Busters
dc.subjectbrush control
dc.subjectinformation dissemination
dc.subjectlandowner participation
dc.subjectrangeland management
dc.subjecttechnology adoption
dc.titleThe Use of Brush Management Methods: A Texas Landowner Survey
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.description.admin-noteLegacy DOIs that must be preserved: 10.2458/azu_rangelands_v58i3_kothmann
dc.source.volume58
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage284-291
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T21:19:07Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
19076-31916-1-PB.pdf
Size:
817.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record