Leadership and Job Satisfaction: Addressing Endogeneity With Panel Data From a Field Experiment
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy
Keywordsemployee job satisfaction
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
CitationAn, S. H., Meier, K. J., Ladenburg, J., & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2020). Leadership and job satisfaction: Addressing endogeneity with panel data from a field experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 589-612.
Rights© The Author(s) 2019
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractThe interaction between leaders and employees plays a key role in determining organizational outcomes and performance. Although the human resources management literature posits positive effects of leadership behaviors on employee job satisfaction, the causal path between the two is unclear due to potential endogeneity issues inherent in this relationship. To address the issue, we first provide theoretical explanations about why and how transformational and transactional leadership behaviors would enhance employee job satisfaction. Second, we test the relationship between leadership behaviors and employee job satisfaction using panel data from a year-long randomized field experiment that engaged leaders and employees from hundreds of public and private organizations in Denmark. Primary findings suggest that although leadership training does not have direct effects on changes in employee job satisfaction, leadership-training-induced changes in leadership behaviors (transformational leadership and verbal rewards) are positively related to changes in job satisfaction.
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
SponsorsDet Frie Forskningsråd