The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTronstad, R.
dc.contributor.authorTeegerstrom, T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:02:55Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01
dc.identifier.citationTronstad, R., & Teegerstrom, T. (2003). Economics of sale weight, herd size, supplementation, and seasonal factors. Journal of Range Management, 56(5), 425-431.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003832
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i5_tronstad
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643460
dc.description.abstractA growth function for range calves is estimated using a polynomial function of calf age that accounts for weather variation, sex, prior calf weights relative to a norm, and a compensatory gain factor. Data on rainfall plus calf weights at birth and when calves were roughly 3, 8, 12, and 20 months of age are used to estimate the growth function. This function is then used to determine the economic trade-off between herd size and calf sale weights, for both spring and fall sale dates. In addition, the profitability of feeding supplement is evaluated by increasing the rate of gain beyond that projected by the the polynomial age growth function for southeast and central Arizona grazing environments when forage and nutrients are limited. Using prices from 1980 to 1998, results indicate that the most profitable herd mix, sale date, and feeding protocol for the southeast Arizona region is 204 kg calves with no supplemental feeding and sales occurring in May. Supplemental feeding and sales occurring at 250 kg head-1 in May is the most profitable herd mix for the central Arizona region. More favorable average daily gain rates for May sales from the central versus southeast is why supplemental feeding is marginally better for the central region than feeding no supplement.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectslaughter weight
dc.subjectherd size
dc.subjectcow-calf operations
dc.subjectbirth weight
dc.subjectgeographical variation
dc.subjectcarrying capacity
dc.subjectproduction costs
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectcalves
dc.subjectgender differences
dc.subjectHereford
dc.subjectprofitability
dc.subjectfeed supplements
dc.subjectprecipitation
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectArizona
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.subjectoptimal calf sale weight
dc.subjectlivestock supplementation effects
dc.subjectlivestock marketing
dc.subjectpolynomial age growth function
dc.subjectrainfall
dc.titleEconomics of sale weight, herd size, supplementation, and seasonal factors
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume56
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage425-431
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:02:55Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9823-9704-1-PB.pdf
Size:
705.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record