Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBooth, D. T.
dc.contributor.authorBai, Y.
dc.contributor.authorRoos, E. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:04:16Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01
dc.identifier.citationBooth, D. T., Bai, Y., & Roos, E. E. (2003). Wyoming big sagebrush seed production from mined and unmined rangelands. Journal of Range Management, 56(5), 542-546.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003848
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i5_booth
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643476
dc.description.abstractWyoming Coal Rules and Regulations require shrubs be returned to mined land and that revegetation "...be self renewing." We evaluated seed production and seed quality of Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis (Beetle Young)) by measuring the effect of mining, herbivory, and environmental modification on seed production at 5 sites on the Dave Johnston Coal Mine near Glenrock, Wyo. Mined-land stands ranged in age from 5 to >20 years. Single sagebrush plants on mined, and adjacent unmined land were treated by: (1) fabric mulch around the base, (2) windbreak on the north and west, (3) both mulch and windbreak, and (4) neither windbreak nor mulch. Plants were fenced and compared with unfenced, untreated, neighboring plants. Seeds were harvested for 3 years and data were collected on seed-stalk numbers, bulk weight of seeds produced, and seed quality. Fenced mined-land plants produced several times more seeds than fenced plants on adjacent unmined land. There was no difference in seed quality. Treatments to modify the plant environment resulted in some benefits but fencing had a greater effect on seed-quality parameters than did planned treatments. We conclude the sagebrush seed-production potential on reclaimed lands such as those of the Dave Johnston Coal Mine is equal to, and often several times greater than that of adjacent unmined lands. However, browsing by wild ungulates can eliminate the mined-land yield advantage.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectmulches
dc.subjectenvironmental law
dc.subjectfences
dc.subjectwindbreaks
dc.subjectmined soils
dc.subjectconservation plants
dc.subjectbrowse plants
dc.subjectseed productivity
dc.subjectyields
dc.subjectWyoming
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectArtemisia tridentata
dc.subjectland restoration
dc.subjectbrowsing
dc.subjectenvironmental effects
dc.subjectseed quality
dc.subjectbig game
dc.subjectsoil moisture
dc.subjectecological restoration
dc.titleWyoming big sagebrush seed production from mined and unmined rangelands
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume56
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage542-546
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:04:16Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9839-9720-1-PB.pdf
Size:
491.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record