Viewpoint: Entropy, concept design, and animal-unit equivalence in range management science
Author
Scarnecchia, David L.Issue Date
2004-01-01Keywords
stocking densitystocking level
stocking rate
stocking variables
animal impact
substitution ratios
terminology
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Scarnecchia, D. L. (2004). Viewpoint: Entropy, concept design, and animal-unit equivalence in range management science. Journal of Range Management, 57(1), 113-116.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The animal unit has been a multiple-use concept in the natural resource sciences. This paper examines the animal unit as an example of a general process of concept design, a process involving multiple options for defining the concept, and multiple objectives and multiple applications for the concept in range management science. Based on this analysis, the animal unit is abstracted as a unit of energy demand independent of interactive considerations of forage or environment. The proposed definition optimizes the utility and universality of the concept by minimizing confounding in the concept's most important applications. The result is a simplified concept that can be used to explicitly express animal equivalences, and can be used in a web of more complex, interactive concepts and models involving human objectives, natural resources, and livestock. The animal unit and animal-unit equivalent are relatively simple examples of synthetic concepts involving communication that are central to the identity of range management science.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0113:VECDAA]2.0.CO;2