Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGillen, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorSims, Phillip L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:47:08Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2004-03-01
dc.identifier.citationGillen, R. L., & Sims, P. L. (2004). Stocking rate, precipitation, and herbage production on sand sagebrush-grassland. Journal of Range Management, 57(2), 148-152.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0148:SRPAHP]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003912
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v57i2_gillen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643515
dc.description.abstractKnowledge of the relationship between stocking rate or grazing intensity and plant production is fundamental to the sustainable management of rangelands. The general management paradigm is that plant production declines as stocking rate increases. Our objective was to determine the impact of stocking rate on herbaceous production of a sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia Torr.)-grassland. Stocking rates averaging 43, 57, and 85 animal-unit-days ha-1 (AUD ha-1) for year-round grazing were applied from 1941 to 1961. Herbaceous plant production was determined by sampling standing crop in temporary exclosures at the end of the growing season from 1958 to 1961, the last 4 years of the grazing study. Total herbaceous production averaged over stocking rates and years was 1,490 kg ha-1. Grasses contributed 89% of the total while forbs contributed 11%. Total production averaged 1,540, 1,470, and 1,450 kg ha-1 for stocking rates of 43, 57, and 85 AUD ha-1 y-1, respectively. There were no differences among stocking rates for total production or for the production of any individual grass species (P > 0.05). Forb production was also not affected by stocking rate, averaging 200, 140, and 120 kg ha-1 for stocking rates of 43, 57, and 85 AUD ha-1 y-1 (P > 0.05). Differences in production among years were much greater than differences among stocking rates for all vegetation components. Little bluestem [Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash] and sand lovegrass [Eragrostis trichodes (Nutt.) Wood] showed the greatest responses to favorable precipitation. Herbaceous production of this sand sagebrush-grassland was little affected by 20 years of differential stocking rates.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectmixed prairie
dc.subjectbiomass
dc.subjectcomposition
dc.titleStocking rate, precipitation, and herbage production on sand sagebrush-grassland
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume57
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage148-152
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:47:09Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
12413-12170-1-PB.pdf
Size:
244.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record