Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTiedemann, Arthur R.
dc.contributor.authorKlemmedson, James O.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:49:46Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-01
dc.identifier.citationTiedemann, A. R., & Klemmedson, J. O. (2004). Responses of desert grassland vegetation to mesquite removal and regrowth. Journal of Range Management, 57(5), 455-465.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/1551-5028(2004)057[0455:RODGVT]2.0.CO;2
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003974
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v57i5_tiedemann
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643567
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the long-term response of understory vegetation in the desert grassland of southeastern Arizona, USA, to removal and regrowth of mesquite Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. velutina (Wooton) Sarg. trees. The study involved 3 treatments applied to mesquite in 1966; mesquite left intact (MI), mesquite removed (MR), and mesquite removed, sprouted, and regrown (MRS). Vegetation responses to 2 litter treatments, litter intact (LI) and litter removed (LR), also were examined. Cover of understory vegetation and juvenile mesquite ( 1.5 m height) were measured in canopy and open (intercanopy) locations. Major changes between 1967 and 1991 were increased cover of juvenile mesquite, shrubs, halfshrubs, bush muhly Muhlenbergia porteri Scribn., and Lehmann lovegrass Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees., and a decline in cover of Arizona cottontop Digitaria californica (Benth.) Chase, and plains bristlegrass Setaria macrostachya H.B.K. Arizona cottontop, plains bristlegrass, and bush muhly were more abundant in canopy locations; black grama Bouteloua eriopoda Torr. and Lehmann lovegrass were more abundant in open locations. Lehmann lovegrass cover was lowest in canopy locations of the mesquite intact treatment. Combination of the mesquite removed and sprouted and litter intact treatments favored increased cover development of native perennial grasses. Litter removal enhanced cover development of Lehmann lovegrass, most likely through increased amount of red light and increased soil temperature fluctuations. Low levels of understory cover (22% average) probably facilitated recruitment of mesquite and other woody plants. Our observation that the greatest cover of Arizona cottontop, plains bristlegrass, and bush muhly occurred in the canopy location of the mesquite intact treatment suggests a potential strategy for maintaining diversity of native perennial grasses. Mature mesquite should be examined as a refuge for native species.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectplant succession
dc.subjectplant litter
dc.subjectLehmann lovegrass
dc.subjectnon-native grass
dc.titleResponses of desert grassland vegetation to mesquite removal and regrowth
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume57
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage455-465
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:49:46Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
12470-12378-1-PB.pdf
Size:
472.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record