Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWillms, W. D.
dc.contributor.authorDormaar, J. F.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, B. W.
dc.contributor.authorDouwes, H. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:59:54Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2002-05-01
dc.identifier.citationWillms, W. D., Dormaar, J. F., Adams, B. W., & Douwes, H. E. (2002). Response of the mixed prairie to protection from grazing. Journal of Range Management, 55(3), 210-216.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003125
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v55i3_willms
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643649
dc.description.abstractThe Mixed Prairie plant communities developed with the influences of fire and grazing. Available evidence suggests that removal of these disturbances could cause succession toward a more mesic type with the accumulation or litter or loss in productivity as nutrient turnover is delayed. Exclosures constructed in 1927 in a semiarid Mixed Prairie community provided an opportunity to examine the effects that protection had on vegetation and soils. Fifteen exclosures were selected for detailed examination; of these, 11 were located on Chernozemic soil and 4 on Solonetzic soil. We measured plant and soil variables both inside and outside the exclosures in a test of the hypothesis that protection from grazing will lead to a loss of production potential of the semi-arid. Mixed Prairie communities in the Northern Great Plains of southeastern Alberta. We found little evidence that 70 years of protection from large animal disturbance reduced the production potential of the plant communities. Conversely, most evidence suggested a neutral effect or an improvement as reflected in an increased cover of Pascopyrum smithii Rydb. (Löve) (P = 0.049) and increased annual net primary production (P = 0.047). The effect of protection appeared largely driven by the accumulation of litter mass that primarily benefits soil and plant indices of quality on the Chernozemic soil type. Although protection tended to reduce species diversity (P = 0.097) among native plants on the Chernozemic soil type, evenness and richness were not affected (P > 0.10). The potential effect that reduced diversity might have on reducing production stability appears more than compensated for by increased litter mass.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectA horizons
dc.subjectcarbon
dc.subjectchernozemic soils
dc.subjectsolonetzic soils
dc.subjectsoil depth
dc.subjectspecies diversity
dc.subjectrange condition
dc.subjectAlberta
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectphosphorus
dc.subjectpH
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectsoil chemistry
dc.subjectprairies
dc.subjectbiomass
dc.subjectplant litter
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectsoil water
dc.subjectsoil nitrogen
dc.subjectsoil depth
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectplant biomass
dc.subjectplant nitrogen
dc.titleResponse of the mixed prairie to protection from grazing
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume55
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage210-216
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:59:54Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9709-9590-1-PB.pdf
Size:
660.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record