• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 55 (2002)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 55, Number 5 (September 2002)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 55 (2002)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 55, Number 5 (September 2002)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Sample numbers for microhistological estimation of fecal vizcacha diets

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    9748-9629-1-PB.pdf
    Size:
    395.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Bontti, E. E.
    Bóo, R. M.
    Issue Date
    2002-09-01
    Keywords
    data analysis
    estimation
    forbs
    diet
    herbivores
    shrubs
    drought
    Argentina
    grasses
    feeding preferences
    diet selection
    precision
    Lagostomus maximus
    central Argentina
    Caldenal
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Bontti, E. E., & Bóo, R. M. (2002). Sample numbers for microhistological estimation of fecal vizcacha diets. Journal of Range Management, 55(5), 498-501.
    Publisher
    Society for Range Management
    Journal
    Journal of Range Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/643690
    DOI
    10.2307/4003229
    10.2458/azu_jrm_v55i5_bontti
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org/
    Abstract
    Precise estimates of diet composition are useful to assess herbivores impact on rangelands and to make management decisions. Since the variability within- and between-samples affect precision of estimates on diet studies, we studied this variability in diets of the rodent vizcacha (Lagostomus maximus Blainv.). We analyzed fecal pellets using a microhistological technique and we estimated the number of samples and subsamples required to achieve given confidence levels. Diets of this herbivore, which is thought to compete with cattle for forage, were studied in November 1994, May, July, and October 1995 in a mixed shrub-grassland community of the southern caldénal in central Argentina. Most grasses, the main components of the diets (> 80%), were estimated with high precision (confidence interval: CI = 10%, p = 0.05) by observing 14 samples and 5 slides per sample. Forbs (5-6%) and shrubs (12%) were estimated with this same number of samples and slides, but yielded a lower level of precision (CI = 20%, p = 0.10). Although our results may not be directly applicable to other vegetation or herbivores, the procedures may be used in other situations to improve precision of diet estimates through microhistological analysis of feces.
    Type
    text
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0022-409X
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.2307/4003229
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal of Range Management, Volume 55, Number 5 (September 2002)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.