N and P fertilization on rangeland production in Midwest Argentina
Issue Date
2000-07-01Keywords
phosphorus fertilizerseconomic analysis
production costs
soil fertility
rain
nitrogen fertilizers
use efficiency
biomass production
application rates
Argentina
rangelands
forage
crude protein
season rain-use efficiency
nutrient use efficiency
range fertilization economics
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Guevara, J. C., Stasi, C. R., Estevez, O. R., & Le Houérou, H. N. (2000). N and P fertilization on rangeland production in Midwest Argentina. Journal of Range Management, 53(4), 410-414.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Low soil nutrient status may be the major limiting factor to forage production in rangelands of the Mendoza plains 4 years out of 10. We studied vegetation responses to annual applications of N and P on such rangelands. Fertilizer application rates were 0 or 25 N and 0 or 11 P (kg ha-1) in a factorial arrangement. Dry matter production of grasses and palatable shrubs and crude protein (CP) content of grasses were determined annually from 1996 to 1998. Experimental plots received rains of 189, 278, and 346 mm during the 3 study years compared to mean growing season rainfall of 258 mm. Forage production was increased by N+P fertilization only in 1998 (1,390 vs 980 kg ha-1, P 0.05), producing 16.5 kg forage kg-1 N applied. Crude protein concentration was increased by N fertilization in 1997 (6.3 vs 5.3%, P < 0.05) and N+P application increased in 1998 (6.8 vs 5.7%, P < 0.05). Nitrogen and P application increased seasonal rain-use efficiency when the rainfall exceeded 300 mm. In 1998, the increase of grass production per kg N applied with and without P was 18.4 and 12.4 kg, respectively. The break-even point between rain and nutrients as the main primary production determinant on sandy soils in the central Mendoza plains is around 400 mm year-1 instead of 300 mm in other arid lands of the world. The value of meat increment derived from the N fertilization, with and without P application (US 0.07 ha-1 year-1 kg-1 N) was lower than the fertilizer cost (US 0.87 kg-1 N). A 5-fold increase in forage yields would be required to offset the cost of fertilizer. Fertilizer application did not increase forage production enough to be profitable for cattle production at present fertilizer and meat prices.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003752
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Effect of defoliation frequency and N-P-K fertilization on maidencaneKalmbacher, R. S.; Martin, F. G. (Society for Range Management, 1988-05-01)Maidencane (Panicum hemitomon Schult.), an important grass on Florida and southeastern Gulf Coast fresh-water marsh range, was cut on 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-week intervals (T) from June to December 1982 and 1983. Half the plots were fertilized every 6 weeks with 56, 12, and 22 kg/ha N, P, and K, respectively. Dry matter yield (DM), tiller density (TD), rhizome total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC), crude protein (CP), and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) were determined. DM was reduced with frequent clipping, especially every 3 weeks, and 2-year average DM was described: 1981 + 660T -22T2, where T is weeks between harvest. Fertilized grass yielded more DM (6,270 kg/ha) than unfertilized (4,410). TD increased as harvest interval increased. For example TD in April 1983 was TD = 40 + 19.1T. TNC was affected by cutting interval (7.2 + 0.61T - $0.016T2) but not fertilization. CP and IVOMD declined about 0.5 and 3.0 units, respectively, for each week forage remained on range. Fertilization improved 2-year average CP (yes = 13.3%, no = 11.9%), but IVOMD was unaffected. Defoliation of maidencane every 3 to 6 weeks reduced stands and yield, and defoliation intervals longer than 3 to 6 weeks resulted in reduced protein and digestibility. Fertilizer rates and timing of application used in this study did help to maintain yield and tiller density at a higher level than unfertilized grass in the second year.
-
The Use of AZSCHED to Schedule Irrigations on WheatClark, Lee J.; Carpenter, Eddie W.; Ottman, Michael (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1991-09)AZSCHED irrigation software was used to schedule irrigation on Aldura wheat on the Safford Agricultural Center with very good results. Irrigations were scheduled at 40%, 50% and 60% calculated soil water depletion throughout the critical part of the growing season. The plots being irrigated at 40% depletion yielded the most and had the highest water use efficiency and showed the least plant stress. Comparing data with previous experiments, it was noted that increased inputs of higher seeding rate and higher nitrogen rate also increased the water use efficiency.
-
Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates for Barley Bred for Reduced Water UseOttman, M. J.; Doerge, T. A.; Sheedy, M. D.; Ramage, R. T.; Ottman, Michael (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1991-09)Barley lines have been developed for one-irrigation conditions. The purpose of these studies is to provide information required to develop recommendations for nitrogen fertilizer practices for one - irrigation barley. A total of nine field studies were conducted at the Marana and Maricopa Agricultural Centers testing six nitrogen rates ranging from 0 to 200 lbs N/A under a variety of conditions. The optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate ranged from 0 to 40 lbs N /A. No relationship was established between optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate and preplant soil nitrate, previous crop, planting date, or number of irrigations (1 vs. 2). Based on the results of this and other studies, a nitrogen rate of 40 to 50 lbs N/A is usually adequate for one-irrigation barley, and nitrogen rates greater than 80 to 100 lbs N/A is considered excessive.