Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReece, P. E.
dc.contributor.authorVolesky, J. D.
dc.contributor.authorSchacht, W. H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:20:16Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2001-03-01
dc.identifier.citationReece, P. E., Volesky, J. D., & Schacht, W. H. (2001). Cover for wildlife after summer grazing on Sandhills rangeland. Journal of Range Management, 54(2), 126-131.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003172
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i2_reece
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643845
dc.description.abstractLivestock production and wildlife habitat objectives become antagonistic on grasslands when the architecture of standing herbage needed for key wildlife species limits the amount of forage that can be used by livestock. However, quantitative information needed to achieve cover objectives for wildlife is not available for summer-grazed grasslands. Three replicates of 7 grazing treatments were applied to the same 1.0-ha pastures for 3 years. Treatments included ungrazed control, and grazing at 16, 32, or 48 animal unit days (AUD) ha(-1) for 5 to 7 days during mid-June or mid-July. Cover was estimated after killing frost in September by measuring the average height below which complete visual obstruction occurred. Cumulative grazing pressure (AUD Mg(-1)) was used to describe grazing effects because of measurable differences in herbage among pastures and dates. Grazing in June reduced the average height of autumn cover at a constant rate from 11.0 to 7.0 cm (R2 = 0.34) as cumulative grazing pressure increased from 16 to 90 AUD Mg(-1). In contrast, declines in cover after grazing in July were about 2.6 times greater for cumulative grazing pressures up to 40 AUD Mg(-1) (R2 = 0.62), indicating a measurable decline in plant growth and an increasing dependence of autumn cover on the remaining herbage when grazing ended. Relatively low predictability of autumn cover after June compared to July grazing was offset by more plant growth during the balance of the growing season. Frequency of low-cover patches (less than or equal to 5.0 cm) within pastures was highly correlated (R2 = 0.94) with mean estimates of autumn cover. Consequently, the quality of cover near potential nesting sites also declined as the average height of cover declined, regardless of grazing date. The interdependence of low-cover patches and mean visual obstruction indicates that either variable could be the primary criterion for nest site selection up to 12 cm in visual obstruction.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjecttympanuchus phasianellus
dc.subjectgrouse
dc.subjecthabitat destruction
dc.subjectnesting
dc.subjectPhasianidae
dc.subjecttiming
dc.subjectvisual obstruction
dc.subjectmultiple use
dc.subjectground cover
dc.subjectcontrolled grazing
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectNebraska
dc.subjectprecipitation
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectplant height
dc.subjectautumn visual obstruction
dc.subjectgrazing pressure
dc.subjectsharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) habitat
dc.titleCover for wildlife after summer grazing on Sandhills rangeland
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume54
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage126-131
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:20:16Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9595-9476-1-PB.pdf
Size:
101.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record