Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinder, J. A.
dc.contributor.authorBailey, C. C.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, M.
dc.contributor.authorHolechek, J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:34:44Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:34:44Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-01
dc.identifier.citationWinder, J. A., Bailey, C. C., Thomas, M., & Holechek, J. (2000). Breed and stocking rate effects on Chihuahuan Desert cattle production. Journal of Range Management, 53(1), 32-38.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003389
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v53i1_winder
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643912
dc.description.abstractProductivity of Barzona, Brangus, and Beefmaster cattle was evaluated on conservatively (n=2) (40 ha AU-1) and moderately (28.5 ha AU-1) stocked pastures (n=2) in the Chihuahuan Desert of south-central New Mexico. Equivalent numbers of suckled, first-calf heifers of each breed (n=31) weighing 333+/-11 kg were randomly assigned to the study pastures in the spring of 1992. Pastures were grazed continuously and herd productivity data were collected from 1992-1994. In late August 1994, all pastures were destocked due to onset of severe drought. No effect of breed (P > 0.10) was detected in the analyses, so data were pooled across breeds and compared between the stocking rates. Calf crop percentages (1993, 1994) were higher in conservative than moderate stocked pastures (82 vs 62%, respectively, P < 0.01). Financial analyses standardized to a hypothetical medium size (8,094 ha) New Mexico Chihuahuan Desert cattle range showed net returns per ha did not differ (P > 0.10) between stocking rates. However, the main effect of year and stocking rate X year interaction were significant (P < 0.05). These analyses suggest that the drought in 1994 lowered returns per ha compared to 1993 when precipitation was near average and that conservative stocking may present less financial risk than moderate stocking when drought occurs. These data are consistent with other studies from arid and semi-arid rangelands demonstrating that conservative stocking can give financial returns from cattle production equal to or greater than those from moderate stocking.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcattle breeds
dc.subjectpregnancy rate
dc.subjectfarm income
dc.subjectlivestock numbers
dc.subjectweaning weight
dc.subjectarid grasslands
dc.subjectarid zones
dc.subjectproduction costs
dc.subjectcalves
dc.subjectcontinuous grazing
dc.subjectbody weight
dc.subjectrain
dc.subjectBrangus
dc.subjectBeefmaster
dc.subjectbarzona
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectbreed differences
dc.subjectbeef cows
dc.subjectshrubs
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectNew Mexico
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.titleBreed and stocking rate effects on Chihuahuan Desert cattle production
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume53
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage32-38
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:34:44Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9478-9359-1-PB.pdf
Size:
40.20Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record