Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoppock, D. L.
dc.contributor.authorSovani, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:38:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:38:09Z
dc.date.issued1999-05-01
dc.identifier.citationCoppock, D. L., & Sovani, S. (1999). Is supplementation justified to compensate pastoral calves for milk restriction?. Journal of Range Management, 52(3), 208-217.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003682
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643968
dc.description.abstractCompetition for milk between calves and pastoral herders may reduce weaning weights, retard growth, and delay puberty in cattle. Calf supplementation could over-ride such effects and improve pastoral economies. To examine these issues in semiarid Ethiopia, 266 Boran calves (Bos indicus) were used in a 2 X 3 plus 1 factorial design contrasting graded levels of supplemental alfalfa hay (i.e., Medicago sativa L. with mean intakes of 0, 344, and 557 g head(-1) day(-1) on a DM basis) and supplemental water (i.e., with mean intakes of 0 and 3.8 liters head(-1) day(-1)). The trial was repeated for animals born in 2 consecutive years. Treatments occurred over a background of simulated traditional management in which calves had limited access to grazing and water and were allowed to suckle about two-thirds of their dams' daily milk yield. Traditionally managed controls received no supplements while other (positive) controls received no supplements but had greater access to milk. After 10 months of treatment calves were weaned and monitored. Supplementation with the high level of hay plus water markedly enhanced (P < 0.01) all productive features of calves at weaning compared to traditionally managed controls, and was an effective substitute for milk forgone in both years. Despite high variability in milk intake, access to supplements, and weaned body size as calves, all male cattle converged in liveweight and other productive features by 3.5 years of age, largely due to compensatory growth of traditionally managed controls. Heifers also converged in various attributes at maturity, but those which had received hay plus extra water as calves still conceived 2.6 to 4.3 months earlier (P < 0.05) than traditionally managed controls. We concluded that supplementation with hay and water can indeed compensate a young calf for typical levels of milk restriction here. Carry-over effects, however, were insufficient to justify large investments in supplementation considering the high inherent risks of production and traditions of marketing mature animals.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectrestricted feeding
dc.subjectsucklings
dc.subjectBoran
dc.subjectpuberty
dc.subjectbirth weight
dc.subjectalfalfa
dc.subjectalfalfa hay
dc.subjectweaning weight
dc.subjectcalf feeding
dc.subjectwater intake
dc.subjectproduction costs
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectheight
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectcalves
dc.subjecthay
dc.subjectfeed supplements
dc.subjectfeed intake
dc.titleIs supplementation justified to compensate pastoral calves for milk restriction?
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume52
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage208-217
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:38:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9409-9290-1-PB.pdf
Size:
72.37Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record