Rangeland cover component quantification using broad (TM) and narrow-band (1.4 NM) spectrometry
Issue Date
1999-05-01Keywords
Artemisia tripartitaBalsamorhiza
spectral analysis
balsamorhiza saggitta
Pseudoroegneria spicata
wavelengths
reflectance
errors
controlled grazing
remote sensing
multispectral imagery
range condition
Idaho
sheep
seasonal variation
canopy
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Bork, E. W., West, N. E., Price, K. P., & Walker, J. W. (1999). Rangeland cover component quantification using broad (TM) and narrow-band (1.4 NM) spectrometry. Journal of Range Management, 52(3), 249-257.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4003687Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Calibrated predictive relationships obtained from simple and multiple regression of thematic mapper or broad-band (BB) and 1.4 nm interval or narrow-band (NB) spectral data were evaluated for quantifying 11 rangeland components (including total vegetation, forb, grass, shrub, litter, and bare soil) and distinguishing among 6 long-term grazing treatments of sagebrush steppe. In general, all 4 data types predicted similar values for each rangeland cover component. Multiple regression models usually had little advantage over simple regression models for predicting cover, particularly for abundant cover components, although this trend was inconsistent among components. Consequently, simple predictive models are recommended for quantifying rangeland indicator components using remotely-sensed data. The use of NB spectral data resulted in lower standard errors of prediction (SEP), although these reductions were inconsistent among rangeland components. Although both data types distinguished among grazing treatments with major plant compositional differences (P < 0.00) using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), only the NB data distinguished between grazing treatments with minor ecological differences (P < 0.01). These results suggest that in a practical context, NB data are advantageous for quantifying rangeland cover components and distinguishing among grazing treatments under the condition of our study.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003687