The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCollum, F. T.
dc.contributor.authorGillen, R. L.
dc.contributor.authorKarges, B. R.
dc.contributor.authorHodges, M. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:42:23Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:42:23Z
dc.date.issued1999-03-01
dc.identifier.citationMcCollum, F. T., Gillen, R. L., Karges, B. R., & Hodges, M. E. (1999). Stocker cattle response to grazing management in tallgrass prairie. Journal of Range Management, 52(2), 120-126.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003504
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644027
dc.description.abstractThe effects of stocking rate and grazing method on performance of yearling beef cattle grazing tallgrass prairies in north-central Oklahoma were evaluated from 1989 to 1994. Pastures dominated by big bluestem [Andropogon gerardii Vitman], little bluestem [Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash], and indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash], were allocated to either short duration rotational or continuous stocking methods and stocking rates ranging from 52 animal-unit-days (AUD) ha(-1) to 90 AUD ha(-1). Steers grazed the units from late April to late September. Precipitation was above average during the study period. Live weight gain per head was higher under continuous stocking than rotational stocking at all stocking rates. At 52 AUD ha(-1), individual gains under rotational stocking were 11% less than under continuous stocking. At 90 AUD ha(-1), individual gains under rotational stocking were decreased by 20%. Measurements of steer diets and forage standing crop suggest the reduction in weight gain was due to reduced forage intake under rotational stocking. Live weight gain per hectare increased with stocking rate and was higher with continuous stocking at all stocking rates. Net returns per hectare increased as stocking rate increased for both stocking methods but were lower for rotational stocking at all stocking rates. Variable costs per head would have to decrease by 24 to 34% under rotational stocking to equalize net returns between the 2 grazing methods. Unless the decline in gain per head can be reduced or eliminated, there is no economic incentive to implement rotational stocking under the conditions of this study.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcosts and returns
dc.subjectSchizachyrium scoparium
dc.subjectproduction costs
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectcontinuous grazing
dc.subjectrain
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectSorghastrum nutans
dc.subjectAndropogon gerardii
dc.subjectrotational grazing
dc.subjectOklahoma
dc.subjectsteers
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.titleStocker cattle response to grazing management in tallgrass prairie
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume52
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage120-126
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:42:23Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9396-9277-1-PB.pdf
Size:
100.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record