Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillalobos, G.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, D. C.
dc.contributor.authorKlopfenstein, T. J.
dc.contributor.authorNichols, J. T.
dc.contributor.authorLamb, J. B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:55:51Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:55:51Z
dc.date.issued1997-07-01
dc.identifier.citationVillalobos, G., Adams, D. C., Klopfenstein, T. J., Nichols, J. T., & Lamb, J. B. (1997). Grass hay as a supplement for grazing cattle. I. Animal performance. Journal of Range Management, 50(4), 351-356.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003298
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644106
dc.description.abstractRegrowth grass hay produced on subirrigated meadows in the Nebraska Sandhills was evaluated as a supplement for gestating beef cows grazing winter range. Ninety-six crossbred spring calving, gestating beef cows were used in a winter supplementation study on upland Sandhills range from 5 November to 27 February in 1990 and again in 1991. Cows were divided into 4 treatments (24 cows/treatment): 1) control (range forage only, no supplement); 2) range forage and 2.2 kg cow-1 day-1 of meadow regrowth hay (15.5% crude protein); 3) range forage and 1.2 kg cow-1 day-1 of a 30% wheat grain and 70% soybean meal:30% wheat supplement (36.0% crude protein); and 4) range forage with supplements in treatments 2 and 3 fed on alternate days. Meadow hay and soybean meal:wheat supplements provided 0.32 kg of crude protein/cow daily. Supplemented cows gained 3 to 53 kg body weight/year and maintained body condition, while control cows lost an average of 24.5 kg body weight/year and lost body condition. Intake of range forage was less (P < 0.05) by cows fed meadow hay and soybean meal:wheat supplements on alternate days than by cows on other treatments. Digestibility of range forage was lower (P < 0.05) for supplemented cows than control cows, but differences were small (avg. = 2%). Calving date, birth and weaning weights, and pregnancy rate were similar (P > 0.05) for all treatments. We concluded that subirrigated meadow regrowth grass hay was an effective alternative to traditional soybean meal-based supplements for maintaining body weight and body condition of gestating beef cows grazing winter range.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectbody condition
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectreproductive performance
dc.subjectchemical composition
dc.subjectNebraska
dc.subjectbeef cows
dc.subjecthay
dc.subjectdietary supplements
dc.subjectfeed supplements
dc.subjectin vitro digestibility
dc.subjectgrasses
dc.subjectfeed intake
dc.titleGrass hay as a supplement for grazing cattle. I. Animal performance
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume50
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage351-356
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:55:51Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9227-9108-1-PB.pdf
Size:
724.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record