Intraspecific competition in honey mesquite: Leaf and whole plant responses
Issue Date
1998-05-01Keywords
intraspecific competitionstand density
volume
leaves
Prosopis glandulosa
stomatal conductance
stems
width
rain
transpiration
photosynthesis
growth rate
leaf water potential
semiarid zones
canopy
plant height
soil water
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ansley, R. J., Trevino, B. A., & Jacoby, P. W. (1998). Intraspecific competition in honey mesquite: Leaf and whole plant responses. Journal of Range Management, 51(3), 345-352.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4003421Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Leaf and whole plant responses of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) to intraspecific competition were compared under low (LD) or high (HD) stand density in a semi-arid region of north Texas. The HD trees occurred within a stand of 300 trees ha-1. The LD trees occurred in areas of the dense stand that were thinned to 80 trees ha-1 with no neighbors within 10 m of study trees. Tree size was similar in each treatment at study initiation. Five years after thinning, tree height, canopy volume, basal stem diameter, leaf area, and leaf area index were significantly greater in LD than HD trees. No differences in leaf predawn water potential, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis were found between LD and HD trees during growing seasons 4 or 6 years after study initiation. Results indicate resources necessary for growth of individual mesquite plants were limiting under increased stand density and suggest the occurrence of intraspecific competition. Limitations were manifest at the whole plant level via modification of tree size and leaf area per tree, and not through adjustment of leaf physiological processes. The limiting factor appeared to be soil water. Daily water loss tree-1 was 2.5 to 4 times greater in LD than HD trees, and ranged from 119 to 205 kg and 46 to 59 kg in LD and HD trees, respectively. Projected daily water loss by mesquite at the stand level was similar between treatments, however, and ranged from 9,500 to 17,700 kg ha-1.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003421