Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaine, L.
dc.contributor.authorUndersander, D. J.
dc.contributor.authorSample, D. W.
dc.contributor.authorBartelt, G. A.
dc.contributor.authorSchatteman, T. A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T06:02:22Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T06:02:22Z
dc.date.issued1997-05-01
dc.identifier.citationPaine, L., Undersander, D. J., Sample, D. W., Bartelt, G. A., & Schatteman, T. A. (1997). Technical note: Comparison of simulated ground nest types for grazing/trampling research. Journal of Range Management, 50(3), 231-233.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003720
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644179
dc.description.abstractOrnithologists often use simulated nests consisting of game bird or domestic poultry eggs to study nest survival. Researchers investigating cattle trampling of ground nests have sometimes used clay targets instead of actual eggs to avoid the confounding effects of nest depredation. To determine whether livestock respond similarly to clay targets and egg nests, we compared inadvertent trampling and intentional disturbance of clay targets versus clutches of 3 pheasant eggs by Angus X Holstein heifers. Overall trampling levels for clay target- and egg-nests were similar (35 and 36%, respectively). Cattle noticed and responded to both types of nests. When noticed, simulated nests were kicked, sniffed, licked, or picked up in the mouth. Cattle disturbed an average of 25% of the clay targets and 8% of the egg nests during 4 trials. Our results suggest that cattle are as likely to inadvertently trample egg nests as they are clay targets, but targets are more likely to attract attention and are therefore disturbed more often than egg nests. The greater likelihood of intentional disturbance of clay targets by cattle reduces the confidence of extrapolating the fate of this type of simulated nest to that of actual nests.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectclay
dc.subjectbirds' nests
dc.subjecteggs
dc.subjectclay pigeons
dc.subjectgame birds
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectanimal behavior
dc.subjectrotational grazing
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectsimulation
dc.subjecttrampling
dc.titleTechnical note: Comparison of simulated ground nest types for grazing/trampling research
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume50
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage231-233
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T06:02:22Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9206-9087-1-PB.pdf
Size:
347.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record